WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

that's a LOT of consistent vote point you got there TWOS

i count 7 bots going by the numbers.

TWOS i think you spam the site with red flagging shit, and the amount you post kills normal website conversation. your website tracked IPs so you could doxx site visitors, so is every single leak you're submitting actually safe?

that's a LOT of consistent vote point you got there TWOS i count 7 bots going by the numbers. TWOS i think you spam the site with red flagging shit, and the amount you post kills normal website conversation. your website tracked IPs so you could doxx site visitors, so is every single leak you're submitting actually safe?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

if people arnt supposed to use the downvote, why do you even offer one?

Because you are a drama queen.

On Poal.co, the downvote is not considered as a "I disagree". It's usually for spam and off-topic posts or comments

https://poal.co/welcome

[–] -1 pt (edited )

you keep saying this but you never explain why people are gonna obey that

if i dont like someone i will downvote them, and there's nothing you can do to stifle that, and any attempt to stifle that is rigging the votes.

it seems to me like you care more about forcing the hand of conversation rather then letting users be free

[–] 1 pt

you keep saying this but you never explain why people are gonna obey that

Fake News. Nowhere in the welcome page it says you must obey the downvote suggestion.

if i dont like someone i will downvote them, and there's nothing you can do to stifle that, and any attempt to stifle that is rigging the votes.

We have an anti-brigading system and if you keep downvoting the same accounts over and over, you'll get all your vote cancelled. But you already know that.

it seems to me like you care more about forcing the hand of conversation rather then letting users be free

It seems to me like you care more about downvoting rather than letting users be free

[–] -1 pt (edited )

We have an anti-brigading system and if you keep downvoting the same accounts over and over, you'll get all your vote cancelled. But you already know that.

you are unfairly preventing users from conducting proper discourse.

It seems to me like you care more about downvoting rather than letting users be free

if upvoting someone is agreeing with them, and discussion, and valid, then why is downvoting NOT considered fair discourse in the opposite direction?

when i talk about something on the naughty list, it seems you guys in poal leadership try to guide people to say certain things, and into certain opinions. fuck your orders, people are free, and i use my freedom to TWOS is a dirty, shady doxxer who both of you know has done evil shit

[–] 1 pt

If you don’t like how we do things here, you are free to leave.