no.
he thinks here is some safe little haven? too bad. we're coming here and exposing him anyways.
no.
he thinks here is some safe little haven? too bad. we're coming here and exposing him anyways.
from madworld:
https://voat .co/v/pizzagatemods/3389425/20239830
Relevant submission: https://voat .co/v/ProtectGoats/3319514
This user has also indirectly admitted to using stolen credentials to send out emails.
thewebofslime [S] 1 points (+1|-0) 7 days ago
I've been slowly waging an email campaign for about two years, where 500 emails per day per gmail account are sent to people in government and media.
This is one such list that I work from; this is every cnn.com email address phished and submitted to the tor web collection. It includes passwords, which can be useful to take control of an account to send from all their contacts, but I generally just email everyone from my own accounts.
think- 0 points (+0|-0) 7 days ago
Sorry if I'm a bit slow today, lol.
So these are the email handles you are sending the info to? Right? Or email handles you use for sending the info out?
What is the tor web collection? It - ahem - sounds illegal. ;-)
thewebofslime [S] 0 points (+0|-0) 7 days ago
I can use my email address to send out emails like ones that link to my site: https:// webofslime.com/tgc (edit: breaking up the link)
If I am feeling I have too much time on my hands, I might try to see which of these I could use to send more than my own email limit. Some passwords are still good, just not for the hotmail.com, gmail.com, and other obvious ones.
The tor collection is perfectly legal and is merely a research tool for security oriented firms and projects. Obviously, it can be used for bad, but using it to raise awareness for legitimate topics is just as fine as using it for advertising firms to spam you with their stupid products.
He also thinks that your passwords are public info.
followthemoney 0 points (+0|-0) 48 minutes ago
You realize that everyone's usernames and passwords across all platforms are basically public information, right?
He also claimed to hold a lot of dox on Voat users:
Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
In addition to all that, he has claimed to database everything and query on anyone, using terabytes of info he has collected.
If you add these examples together, the intent is clear.
Edit: breaking up the link.
more from argosciv:
https://voat .co/v/pizzagatemods/3389425/20240050
we can consider it resolved at this point
Not really, given that TWOS has continued to slander srayzie in allegiance with the worst of the worst and continues to hand wave (relying on reader ignorance/laziness) in an attempt to downplay his actions and reinsert himself into a community (pizzagaters)(see linked comment and bottom of main post) which he has demonstrated a willingness to dox the members of, under the guise of a manufactured crisis, using his website as a honeypot and any other conceivable tool at his disposal including emails and other data obtained and disseminated by malicious hackers.
To an extent, you're right to mention that doxing was not okay regardless of sides and that some acted appropriately and others not. TWOS's involvement and malevolence, however, goes beyond just the scope of the situation directly involving srayzie and he has thusfar escaped any repercussions.
As an aside, take a look at the voting in this submission's comments and the shitbergs who are throwing their smarmy comments in and tell me it looks organic... /s
JUST NOW HERE ON POAL he admits once again to doxxing:
https://poal.co/s/MeanwhileOnVoat/85665/f8d88bdc-b6fd-4c16-8925-75c37981f675
You collect the information! Why?!
Many people have this information and many more hacks. They are widely shared across many platforms.
I collect this information because I've been doxxing people like NXIVM cult members.
Here, I doxx the rothschild people because they are up to no good...
Here, I doxx Serco employees that control voting machines and prisons in the US, even though they are owned by the crown.
Here, I doxx CNN employees, so we can all send them Pizzagate stories and help get the word out...
Here, I doxx hillarclinton emails that no news has ever reported on.
So, your fake outrage looks insane to a lot of people. I doxx all the time and I am looking for corrupt figureszx and I am helping genuine researchers will look into this stuff, as well. The fact that you don't know about any of it means you have no actual interest in being a researcher and looking into this stuff.... you just post what other people give you.
I also doxxed the FBI guys in charge of covering up the Pizzagate investigation. Paul Abbate is one of them. Ever send him an email asking what's up? What would you say you actually do, here?
Have you not read anything I've ever written? I doxx bad actors all the time. I do it to inform the public, which is why I shared your criminal record. You spent months moralizing at me like you were better than me and you do no research, you harass people, rather than do research, and you use naked pictures of yourself to gain support. So, please... don't call me insane and don't act like my doxxing is bad. I've done more research than Crensch or any one of those people who claim that I am a bad actor. Notice that the people who don't like me don't actually do any research. That is why you are so hated by so many people.
You were criminally harassing gothamgirl, and I exposed you for being a criminal one time, that immediately deleted and I never posted it afterwards. I described a few times, sure, but I only posted it once.
When you started being mean to me (dumb idea being mean to random people, btw) I had already identified you... remember? When I said I know you PERSONALLY didn't attack my site? I told you I knew who you were, but you spent the better part of six months shitting on me for no reason.
That's stalker behavior.
So, if you don't like me doxxing people like NXIVM members, you just proved you are a shill, even further than before.
Your fake outrage is the dead give away.
As the leader of GreatAwakening it never occurred to you to actually look at my research?
I bring up gothamgirl because you shared her doxx repeatedly. I bring it up because it is a salient point that shows you are not genuinely against doxxing. You LOVE doxxing. You have proved it.
Why not do research instead of picking fights on the Internet? The fact that you don't realize you picked a fight with me and lost 4 or 5 months ago, shows that you haven't been paying any real attention.
Answer for everyone... should I or should I not do NXIVM members and things like their "executive care services."?
The discussion we had last night involved defining the difference between what is good doxxing and bad doxxing. Why don't we start there.
In your opinion, who is and who is not allowed to be doxxed and for what reasons? All of the noise you are making is not addressing the main issue.
It is a lie that you don't like doxxing. You like doxxing in the right circumstances. What are those circumstances? Everyone would like to know your opinion.
said literally half an hour ago
from madworld:
https://voat .co/v/pizzagatemods/3389425/20239830
>Relevant submission: https://voat .co/v/ProtectGoats/3319514
>This user has also indirectly admitted to using stolen credentials to send out emails.
>>thewebofslime [S] 1 points (+1|-0) 7 days ago
>>I've been slowly waging an email campaign for about two years, where 500 emails per day per gmail account are sent to people in government and media.
>>This is one such list that I work from; this is every cnn.com email address phished and submitted to the tor web collection. It includes passwords, which can be useful to take control of an account to send from all their contacts, but I generally just email everyone from my own accounts.
>>>think- 0 points (+0|-0) 7 days ago
>>>Sorry if I'm a bit slow today, lol.
>>>So these are the email handles you are sending the info to? Right? Or email handles you use for sending the info out?
>>>What is the tor web collection? It - ahem - sounds illegal. ;-)
>>>>thewebofslime [S] 0 points (+0|-0) 7 days ago
>>>>I can use my email address to send out emails like ones that link to my site: https:// webofslime.com/tgc (edit: breaking up the link)
>>>>If I am feeling I have too much time on my hands, I might try to see which of these I could use to send more than my own email limit. Some passwords are still good, just not for the hotmail.com, gmail.com, and other obvious ones.
>>>>The tor collection is perfectly legal and is merely a research tool for security oriented firms and projects. Obviously, it can be used for bad, but using it to raise awareness for legitimate topics is just as fine as using it for advertising firms to spam you with their stupid products.
>He also thinks that your passwords are public info.
>>followthemoney 0 points (+0|-0) 48 minutes ago
>>You realize that everyone's usernames and passwords across all platforms are basically public information, right?
>He also claimed to hold a lot of dox on Voat users:
>>Crensch said I was all talk.. or something to that effect. Again, as I've been saying for months, I have a lot of doxx on a lot of people. I have more criminal histories, as well. (Of Voat users)
>In addition to all that, he has claimed to database everything and query on anyone, using terabytes of info he has collected.
>If you add these examples together, the intent is clear.
>Edit: breaking up the link.
more from argosciv:
https://voat .co/v/pizzagatemods/3389425/20240050
>>we can consider it resolved at this point
>Not really, given that TWOS has continued to slander srayzie in allegiance with the worst of the worst and continues to hand wave (relying on reader ignorance/laziness) in an attempt to downplay his actions and reinsert himself into a community (pizzagaters)(see linked comment and bottom of main post) which he has demonstrated a willingness to dox the members of, under the guise of a manufactured crisis, using his website as a honeypot and any other conceivable tool at his disposal including emails and other data obtained and disseminated by malicious hackers.
>To an extent, you're right to mention that doxing was not okay regardless of sides and that some acted appropriately and others not. TWOS's involvement and malevolence, however, goes beyond just the scope of the situation directly involving srayzie and he has thusfar escaped any repercussions.
>As an aside, take a look at the voting in this submission's comments and the shitbergs who are throwing their smarmy comments in and tell me it looks organic... /s
JUST NOW HERE ON POAL he admits once again to doxxing:
https://poal.co/s/MeanwhileOnVoat/85665/f8d88bdc-b6fd-4c16-8925-75c37981f675
>>You collect the information! Why?!
>https://www.pcworld.com/article/3336026/collections-2-5-leak-of-over-2-billion-email-addresses-probably-has-your-information.html
>Many people have this information and many more hacks. They are widely shared across many platforms.
>I collect this information because I've been doxxing people like NXIVM cult members.
>Here, I doxx the rothschild people because they are up to no good...
>https://pastebin.com/LMdu20YZ
>Here, I doxx Serco employees that control voting machines and prisons in the US, even though they are owned by the crown.
>Here, I doxx CNN employees, so we can all send them Pizzagate stories and help get the word out...
>https://pastebin.com/pmH6djn0
>Here, I doxx hillarclinton emails that no news has ever reported on.
>So, your fake outrage looks insane to a lot of people. I doxx all the time and I am looking for corrupt figureszx and I am helping genuine researchers will look into this stuff, as well. The fact that you don't know about any of it means you have no actual interest in being a researcher and looking into this stuff.... you just post what other people give you.
>I also doxxed the FBI guys in charge of covering up the Pizzagate investigation. Paul Abbate is one of them. Ever send him an email asking what's up? What would you say you actually do, here?
>Have you not read anything I've ever written? I doxx bad actors all the time. I do it to inform the public, which is why I shared your criminal record. You spent months moralizing at me like you were better than me and you do no research, you harass people, rather than do research, and you use naked pictures of yourself to gain support. So, please... don't call me insane and don't act like my doxxing is bad. I've done more research than Crensch or any one of those people who claim that I am a bad actor. Notice that the people who don't like me don't actually do any research. That is why you are so hated by so many people.
>You were criminally harassing gothamgirl, and I exposed you for being a criminal one time, that @kevdude immediately deleted and I never posted it afterwards. I described a few times, sure, but I only posted it once.
>When you started being mean to me (dumb idea being mean to random people, btw) I had already identified you... remember? When I said I know you PERSONALLY didn't attack my site? I told you I knew who you were, but you spent the better part of six months shitting on me for no reason.
>>That's stalker behavior.
>So, if you don't like me doxxing people like NXIVM members, you just proved you are a shill, even further than before.
>Your fake outrage is the dead give away.
>As the leader of GreatAwakening it never occurred to you to actually look at my research?
>I bring up gothamgirl because you shared her doxx repeatedly. I bring it up because it is a salient point that shows you are not genuinely against doxxing. You LOVE doxxing. You have proved it.
>Why not do research instead of picking fights on the Internet? The fact that you don't realize you picked a fight with me and lost 4 or 5 months ago, shows that you haven't been paying any real attention.
>Answer for everyone... should I or should I not do NXIVM members and things like their "executive care services."?
>The discussion we had last night involved defining the difference between what is good doxxing and bad doxxing. Why don't we start there.
>In your opinion, who is and who is not allowed to be doxxed and for what reasons? All of the noise you are making is not addressing the main issue.
>It is a lie that you don't like doxxing. You like doxxing in the right circumstances. What are those circumstances? Everyone would like to know your opinion.
said @thewebofslime literally half an hour ago
(post is archived)