Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Sometimes free speech has consequences, but there should never be any limit set on what can be said regardless of the potential side effects. You should be allowed to yell "fire" in a crowded theater but know that if you cause mayhem to ensue that you will pay a price when the crowd realizes you were lying.

Having accepted that there can be moral and ethical limits applied to our freedom of speech opened the door to the removal of our right to freedom of speech. You should be able to say anything you would like to, but no one else have an obligation to agree with you.

Speech became a crime when the first person to say "yelling fire in a crowded theater should not be protected speech because of the safety concerns it may bring". Fuck the guy who first said that. He was probably a kike who rubbed his hands while he said it.

Sometimes free speech has consequences, but there should never be any limit set on what can be said regardless of the potential side effects. You should be allowed to yell "fire" in a crowded theater but know that if you cause mayhem to ensue that you will pay a price when the crowd realizes you were lying. Having accepted that there can be moral and ethical limits applied to our freedom of speech opened the door to the removal of our right to freedom of speech. You should be able to say anything you would like to, but no one else have an obligation to agree with you. Speech became a crime when the first person to say "yelling fire in a crowded theater should not be protected speech because of the safety concerns it may bring". Fuck the guy who first said that. He was probably a kike who rubbed his hands while he said it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 1 pt

Absolute free speech means you get to do that, and that's a good thing. Anything met ((("with best intentions"))) is enough to make a crack "I guess there can be more things we should must censor" (oh, they say "should" at first, see how quickly it changes).

Come at it from a different angle. The founding fathers where NOT thinking, "but what if small concession must be made" instead they were thinking "there must be no limit on what we can speak, as there is no limit to what our (((ENEMIES))) can do jew"