Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

483

Sometimes free speech has consequences, but there should never be any limit set on what can be said regardless of the potential side effects. You should be allowed to yell "fire" in a crowded theater but know that if you cause mayhem to ensue that you will pay a price when the crowd realizes you were lying.

Having accepted that there can be moral and ethical limits applied to our freedom of speech opened the door to the removal of our right to freedom of speech. You should be able to say anything you would like to, but no one else have an obligation to agree with you.

Speech became a crime when the first person to say "yelling fire in a crowded theater should not be protected speech because of the safety concerns it may bring". Fuck the guy who first said that. He was probably a kike who rubbed his hands while he said it.

Sometimes free speech has consequences, but there should never be any limit set on what can be said regardless of the potential side effects. You should be allowed to yell "fire" in a crowded theater but know that if you cause mayhem to ensue that you will pay a price when the crowd realizes you were lying. Having accepted that there can be moral and ethical limits applied to our freedom of speech opened the door to the removal of our right to freedom of speech. You should be able to say anything you would like to, but no one else have an obligation to agree with you. Speech became a crime when the first person to say "yelling fire in a crowded theater should not be protected speech because of the safety concerns it may bring". Fuck the guy who first said that. He was probably a kike who rubbed his hands while he said it.

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

It is legal but based on context. That matters and is in some opinion's relevant.

The only real unprotected "speech" is a call to action. That is a grey zone to me since sometimes that is not only just but necessary. It is basically in our constitution that if our government turns tyrannical that it is not a right but a OBLIGATION to overthrow it. That, in itself, would mean that speech talking about overthrowing the government should be protected speech.

I am not black/White on these things and I think context matters but things are complicated. If the "left" were to completely take over and start trying to go house to house to take guns and put people that didn't agree with them in jail I would consider that Tyrannical and would expect the population to fight back.

On their side, they say if you won't let pedos fuck kids or cut off their parts then that is tyrannical.

Its all a fucking mess but I think we should all be able to agree on some of these things like.. Don't fuck (or fuck with) kids. The left does not agree, as such I feel like they should all be in jail or camps. They won't like that opinion though.

[–] • 4 pts

Yeah it's complicated, but it should not be up to the interpretation of those in power. Society can decide for itself what might be off limits, but the government du jour should not be the ones to call it they way they want it. That itself is an indicator that the government has gone off the rails and needs to be reset.

[–] • 2 pts
[–] • 2 pts

I think whoever came up with that saying was an arsonist.

[–] • 1 pt

I'm against free speech. It brought us where we are today.

Someone says toddles can consent?

Someone says men can become women and children should be chemically castrated?

Someone advocates for policies that would clearly harm our nation?

Someone buys an entire media house and starts using it to spew jewish talmudic degeneracy and corrupt the minds of our people?

I hope one day to be in position to personally knock on the doors of these people at 3AM to make them aware that they opened their degenerate mouths and crossed the line of no return.

I'm all for minimal government and letting the normal people live their lives in peace and happiness just like God intended, but that minimal government must be strong and efficient in dealing with anything that threatens that peace and happiness.

Maybe jews got kicked out 109 times, but we got fooled 110 times, and one day, one of those times is going to be final for them or us.

[–] • 1 pt

Absolute free speech means you get to do that, and that's a good thing. Anything met ((("with best intentions"))) is enough to make a crack "I guess there can be more things we should must censor" (oh, they say "should" at first, see how quickly it changes).

Come at it from a different angle. The founding fathers where NOT thinking, "but what if small concession must be made" instead they were thinking "there must be no limit on what we can speak, as there is no limit to what our (((ENEMIES))) can do jew"