>I think you are projecting unfounded 2A fears onto future Trump
Not unfounded. Trump has advocated for gun laws in the past. But sure, whatever you think.
>MAGA constituents won't stand for more gun laws But now their precious god-emperor has been attacked, and if he wants gun laws they'll fall in line. You'll be no different.
>Trump embraces the Constitution and 2A
Uh huh, sure he does. That's why he is all for tearing apart the 2A even further by implementing red flag laws well before this event. Totally means he's actually for the second amendment. That's why Feinstein was clapping her hands in joy like a the demented kike gremlin she is during that meeting years ago, not because he was anti-gun.
>Recent SCOTUS decisions are pushing back the "gray areas" exploited by non-confirmed, non-elected bureacrats making new laws.
And those decisions mean fuck all to the "elected" fuckwits in office. They don't give a shit. You think "Muh constitution" and "Muh laws" mean anything to them? They spit on all of that, their only rule is "We win, Whites lose." Those two things aren't magic that stops people from doing things, otherwise there would never once be murder and we'd have the 2A as the Founding Fathers intended.
2022:
Trump's opinions can be a political moving target that he effectively uses to manipulate and expose his (((GOPe))) counterparts.
Fundamentally, Trump will protect 2A. I can agree with taking guns from certified nutjobs as long as it includes a psychological evaluation, judge and court with legal representation of the defendant. That would prevent bullshit accusations from gaining any traction. The trannys would all lose all of their guns.
(post is archived)