Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

467

If you're a hamplanet and you finally decide to lose weight, there are many, many, many things that must be changed to fix things. No one, single thing is necessary on it's own, nor are all of the things you could do necessary. However each of the things you could do is beneficial in a different capacity and multiple will be necessary in any reasonable manner.

The same is true for fixing White Countries. No, voting won't solve things as far gone and controlled that they are. But voting will help sway minds, shift the window, open conversations, collectivize, fortify, and educate. This is why I was so insistent and what I assume came off as annoying with my "jew" and "White" push. I think now everyone can see It collectivizes minds, people, ideas, goals. Will my push, on it's own fix things? Nope, not even close. Will it help establish a state-of-being in which things are more tenable to be fixed? I think it will. The same is true of voting, despite how useless it feels, it still matters.

If you're a hamplanet and you finally decide to lose weight, there are many, many, many things that must be changed to fix things. No one, single thing is necessary on it's own, nor are all of the things you could do necessary. However each of the things you could do is beneficial in a different capacity and multiple will be necessary in any reasonable manner. The same is true for fixing White Countries. No, voting won't solve things as far gone and controlled that they are. But voting will help sway minds, shift the window, open conversations, collectivize, fortify, and educate. This is why I was so insistent and what I assume came off as annoying with my "jew" and "White" push. I think now everyone can see It collectivizes minds, people, ideas, goals. Will my push, on it's own fix things? Nope, not even close. Will it help establish a state-of-being in which things are more tenable to be fixed? I think it will. The same is true of voting, despite how useless it feels, it still matters.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

In 2009-ish Peter Hitchens suggested the UK's is locked into a 2-party political system which continues to get worse. The 2 corpses of parties are locked against each other propped against each other. For everything that goes wrong one party will always blame the other. The only way to fix the situation is to dislodge one of the corpses, one must lose, and fall big.

In today's UK politics, the Conservatives have just lost big, and Labour got the win not because they were popular but because they were second by default. 60% of the UK voted in these elections and of that Labour got approximately 34% - that is to say with only 20% of the electorate, Labour won more than 50% of the parliament seats. Everything that goes wrong from here people will label directly on Labour - they have no excuse. For conservatives they had been taking people's votes for granted and doing whatever the fuck the globalists want and this is a slap in the face that they can't do that. Maybe they'll reflect on the problem and do good or maybe they'll be replaced by Reform (Not perfect but at least they're in the correct ball park of what people want - secure borders).

I suppose my mad ramblings here are that sometimes a party has to fail in order to realize they need to listen to the voters more than their donors.

[–] • 0 pt

I suppose my mad ramblings here are that sometimes a party has to fail in order to realize they need to listen to the voters more than their donors.

Nope. Neither party in the UK nor the US listens to it's constituency. Voters listen to each other though, see each other and that's why voting matters. It forces things to be said which otherwise would not have. It's real meaningless to give a fuck what the 0 party system cares for.

[–] • 0 pt

I suppose also, if 1 party fails then it opens the door to new parties rising. People stop voting because they've probably despaired from the current system which then is a green light for talking about other parties which might interest them and be more aligned with based values.