WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

102

The protections for POWs in the Geneva conventions where written for actual soldiers, who put their lives on the line for their countries and people. Not for cowards hiding behind a screen, using pseudo-kamikaze tactics.

Drone pilots should be treated as unlawful combatants, to be indefinitely detained or worse if necessary. There is even a good legal justification for this. They don't technically wear uniforms when engaged in hostilities.

The protections for POWs in the Geneva conventions where written for actual soldiers, who put their lives on the line for their countries and people. Not for cowards hiding behind a screen, using pseudo-kamikaze tactics. Drone pilots should be treated as unlawful combatants, to be indefinitely detained or worse if necessary. There is even a good legal justification for this. They don't technically wear uniforms when engaged in hostilities.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

What about those firing missiles from hundreds/thousands miles away?

[–] 1 pt

That's an interesting question. I'd say if the missile is fired from a ship (by someone on the ship) then they're a legitimate sailor.

[–] 0 pt

They remain combatants, even if this insulated. This feels like a throw back to the treatment of snipers or artillerymen in enemy hands.

They technically don't wear uniforms

They do until proven otherwise (you have to capture them).

[–] 0 pt

If your scenario is enacted, the solution that the military will use will be to basically build Skynet.

[–] 0 pt

Laws are just selectively enforced bullshit. Haven't you figured that out by now?