Your logic is not going to hold up under a microscope.
1) digital currencies =/ cryptocurrencies. 2) cryptocurrencies can be both proof of work, proof of stake, or some hybrid of the two. 3) proof of work cryptocurrencies literally have their value tied to the amount of energy used to "mine" them, because as their value increases, the miners can afford more hardware to mine them. 4) proof of stake cryptocurrencies do not have their value tied to "mining", but "staking". This is where whoever owns the most of the cryptocurrency "votes" to confirm which transactions are allowed into a block. 5) both types of cryptocurrency can and are controlled by jewry using a multi-pronged approach. a) infiltrate and take over the development team behind the cryptocurrency. b) build an astroturf community around the cryptocurrency to change its social values from ones of economic freedom, to gambling and greed. c) regulate them with government institutions, turning them into ID verified, regulated gambling vouchers instead of a technology that competes with fiat currencies and can allow for parallel economies outside of their control. 6) digital currencies (the government ones) are something entirely different and managed by governments/central banks. They are nothing more than a surveillance unit managed in a database by these institutions, where everything from what you can buy to how much you are taxed can be micromanaged by these institutions. 7) digital currencies are backed by the ability for the institution backing them to wage war or exert influence. Some of that is tied to oil, but the truth is that it's a measure of the economic and military strength of global jewry, along with their willingness to prop up a specific national currency. jewry can decide to crash any national currency right now. They control the Central Banks. 8) there plan with digital currencies is to allow them to operate freely for 10-20 years, just like with the internet. Then when people are hopelessly dependent and used to using them, start using them for micro and macro societal control and tyranny.
As a foundation, you have to understand the concept of these things, not mix them into the same bucket.
I see your logic but will point out, you can't have a "viable" digital currency without crypto. Otherwise it's simply numbers people can't confirm. But you are right, my commentary makes no distinction between digital currency and crypto currency; the later of which is a subset of the former.
They could use a cheap proof of stake crypto like a fork of Ripple or Stellar that has a lot of centralization, but their "digital currency" will simply be rebranded numbers in a database. The difference will be the Central Bank will control the database entirely, down to your individual bank account, not just the reserve accounts held by the banks with the Fed.
Mexico, China, and a lot of other countries already have this system. It will start off like that. Then they will extend it to be more invasive later.
(post is archived)