Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

Climate change propaganda and support for digital currencies are hypocritical and ideologically in opposition to each.

Digital currencies have created enormous power grid burdens. Digital currencies are actually units of energy burned. The larger the "value", the more energy has been wasted on its creation. Digital currencies are actually oil currencies. Their value is directly linked to today's cost of oil energy.

Call people out and expose those who support these things.

Climate change propaganda and support for digital currencies are hypocritical and ideologically in opposition to each. Digital currencies have created enormous power grid burdens. Digital currencies are actually units of energy burned. The larger the "value", the more energy has been wasted on its creation. Digital currencies are actually oil currencies. Their value is directly linked to today's cost of oil energy. Call people out and expose those who support these things.

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Your plan is to use logic, have a reasonable discourse, and persuade them?

Good luck with that.

[–] • 1 pt

LOL. Exactly.

[–] • 1 pt

Ridicule is extremely powerful. Shaming them for their hypocrisy and stupidity is a potent weapon. The people who support this nonsense are especially vulnerable to its power. We know this because they already support those platitudes and that's how they got there.

[–] • 1 pt

Normally, I'd agree. However, these people have no shame and/or conscience. If they do, it's been compartmentalized and overridden. They've been mind controlled and believe the last talking point they've heard.

[–] • 0 pt

Your shame mechanism is still based upon logic and reason. These people have neither.

i.e. They can't feel shame at hypocrisy because it doesn't exist for them.

e.g. Their intent is better than yours therefore you are evil and they are right.

Their brains can't comprehend more in the same way you can't comprehend their simplified thought.

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Your logic is not going to hold up under a microscope.

1) digital currencies =/ cryptocurrencies. 2) cryptocurrencies can be both proof of work, proof of stake, or some hybrid of the two. 3) proof of work cryptocurrencies literally have their value tied to the amount of energy used to "mine" them, because as their value increases, the miners can afford more hardware to mine them. 4) proof of stake cryptocurrencies do not have their value tied to "mining", but "staking". This is where whoever owns the most of the cryptocurrency "votes" to confirm which transactions are allowed into a block. 5) both types of cryptocurrency can and are controlled by jewry using a multi-pronged approach. a) infiltrate and take over the development team behind the cryptocurrency. b) build an astroturf community around the cryptocurrency to change its social values from ones of economic freedom, to gambling and greed. c) regulate them with government institutions, turning them into ID verified, regulated gambling vouchers instead of a technology that competes with fiat currencies and can allow for parallel economies outside of their control. 6) digital currencies (the government ones) are something entirely different and managed by governments/central banks. They are nothing more than a surveillance unit managed in a database by these institutions, where everything from what you can buy to how much you are taxed can be micromanaged by these institutions. 7) digital currencies are backed by the ability for the institution backing them to wage war or exert influence. Some of that is tied to oil, but the truth is that it's a measure of the economic and military strength of global jewry, along with their willingness to prop up a specific national currency. jewry can decide to crash any national currency right now. They control the Central Banks. 8) there plan with digital currencies is to allow them to operate freely for 10-20 years, just like with the internet. Then when people are hopelessly dependent and used to using them, start using them for micro and macro societal control and tyranny.

As a foundation, you have to understand the concept of these things, not mix them into the same bucket.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I see your logic but will point out, you can't have a "viable" digital currency without crypto. Otherwise it's simply numbers people can't confirm. But you are right, my commentary makes no distinction between digital currency and crypto currency; the later of which is a subset of the former.

[–] • 1 pt

They could use a cheap proof of stake crypto like a fork of Ripple or Stellar that has a lot of centralization, but their "digital currency" will simply be rebranded numbers in a database. The difference will be the Central Bank will control the database entirely, down to your individual bank account, not just the reserve accounts held by the banks with the Fed.

Mexico, China, and a lot of other countries already have this system. It will start off like that. Then they will extend it to be more invasive later.

[–] • 2 pts

The end goal is to enslave us into submission with credit scores.

Just like people using cloud services because they are too lazy to set up their own NAS and backup system.

[–] • 1 pt

For the average internet user that's like saying "just like people going to surgeons instead of learning to do pancreatic surgery themselves".

Unless there's something they can download and doubleclick on that just works 100%, it's going to be too much of an ask.