Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

920

They're apparently to the point where if they were to break up, he'd die.

It's totally not the vax, tho. But he's a bot, as soon as the narrative changed from "prevents disease" to "just makes it less severe," he was repeating it like it was programmed.

They're apparently to the point where if they were to break up, he'd die. It's totally not the vax, tho. But he's a bot, as soon as the narrative changed from "prevents disease" to "just makes it less severe," he was repeating it like it was programmed.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (53).
[–] • 0 pt

Nah, imho they just cease to exist - permanently. No consciousness, no pain no pleasure, no afterlife, no wishywashy floating in a safe space, no coming back as another being/ individual, just gone done and essentially deleted. The only way someone gets to live on is through their progeny and DNA. That is everlasting life. Your personal genetic familial line continually procreating and propagating.

[–] • 2 pts

Wrong, and dangerous..

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Nope, only dangerous if one believes they have no need to procreate in order to for them via their DNA to 'live forever'.

Implying that childless people can somehow 'live forever' or go on to another life is not only unverifiable but neglects the actual need to procreate, which we all know is a globohomo agenda.

[–] • 0 pt

>Implying that childless people can somehow 'live forever' or go on to another life is not only unverifiable but neglects the actual need to procreate

That would be their own personal sin, but at any rate it doesn't prove anything about an afterlife.