I feel like you are trying to act like 5 is the "best and only option"
I'm not telling you its the only option. But it is the best option. Heres why.
I'm telling you all these options are going to happen, maybe one at a time, maybe in parallel.
Option 5 will precede option 2, whether you participate in option 5 or not.
If we do not control option 5, if it is not an organic movement, then the regime and its secret police will. And if we do not own option 5, then the regime will control the movement and outcome of option 2 and the others.
"The best way to prevent competition is to control it" is part of their core methods. Start at that premise.
Now ask yourself, when these things come to pass-- who do you want controlling any new political parties?
It's not about the votes. It's about mass movements.
Theres going to be a lot of suffering in the coming seasons and years. And when it does some group will have to be scapegoated. The only question is if we're going to allow ourselves to become that group without a voice or pushback.
3+4 have already been happening for many years now and it wont stop until actual civil war and collapse starts, while the conviction of the people who felt they were the best options have only been proven right and made stronger with recent events.
5 is utterly irrelevant in the face of 2 (civil war). With a real and open civil war 5 is either with the civil war or is outside of it trying to play games on the other side of the "map" while the people they are claiming to protect and fight for die in war. If they are in the war then they are not doing anything about laws or political offices on the other side anyway.
If the civil war is lost 5 is dead either way being the party of the losing side, or being a party representing a dead population. If the civil war is won against the elite, you dont need to play their political games in a dead system and 5 is again irrelevant.
5 only matters if they actually won and cleaned house before war ever starts (civil or foreign war). Sure you can say 5 is both inevitable and you would be stupid not to try it, but I can also argue that its already been tried and failed repeatedly with the outcome being the continual poisoning of Whites.
Even when 5 gets its perfect win, 4 are still winners having not needed 5 to survive in the first place and not needing them to survive in the future.
I wont wait "two more weeks" for 5 to magically win and punish all the bad people and fix a mess hundreds of years in the making. I will continue to work on 4 with my family.
"that group without a voice" the only ones that can speak will be the survivors, I vote collapse because I have faith in who will be strong enough to survive.
Other than that I dont agree that what controls 5 will have an impact on the result After the civil war as the civil war would destroy the entire structure 5 is built on top of.
5 is utterly irrelevant in the face of 2 (civil war)
you and I both know command & control is essential. Political parties are the path to that in the event of war.
5 only matters if they actually won and cleaned house before war ever starts
"before war ever starts" -> "win before the war even starts!"
And in an instant everything you wrote becomes instantly irrelevant.
And now I know why you're so hellbent on dissuading from the notion.
Kike narrative. playbook even. "do nothing. nothing will work. especially those things which would or could because you have to finish everything before even starting! oy vey!"
It's the cart before horse argument. Not buying. No thanks. Nice try snipdick. Go back to your rainy little socialist island.
"I don't agree therefore kike" Lame that you end all that effort on making decent arguments that way.
You said 5 was the best, I, others in this thread, and thousands of others in real life disagree and that is ok.
Your options regarding war were 1 "third world war using draft" which has not happened and 2 " a civil war " which has not happened, while providing 5 as an Alternative "option / path" with no mention of war then get Pissy at me for taking that argument at face value?
So my (((kike))) narrative is saying "do nothing, nothing will work" despite me clearly talking about building separatist societies to survive and thrive in the war game scenario with the options you laid out. So Fuck You you sniveling little shitstain. I should have not even wasted my time playing along with you here.
(post is archived)