5 is utterly irrelevant in the face of 2 (civil war)
you and I both know command & control is essential. Political parties are the path to that in the event of war.
5 only matters if they actually won and cleaned house before war ever starts
"before war ever starts" -> "win before the war even starts!"
And in an instant everything you wrote becomes instantly irrelevant.
And now I know why you're so hellbent on dissuading from the notion.
Kike narrative. playbook even. "do nothing. nothing will work. especially those things which would or could because you have to finish everything before even starting! oy vey!"
It's the cart before horse argument. Not buying. No thanks. Nice try snipdick. Go back to your rainy little socialist island.
"I don't agree therefore kike" Lame that you end all that effort on making decent arguments that way.
You said 5 was the best, I, others in this thread, and thousands of others in real life disagree and that is ok.
Your options regarding war were 1 "third world war using draft" which has not happened and 2 " a civil war " which has not happened, while providing 5 as an Alternative "option / path" with no mention of war then get Pissy at me for taking that argument at face value?
So my (((kike))) narrative is saying "do nothing, nothing will work" despite me clearly talking about building separatist societies to survive and thrive in the war game scenario with the options you laid out. So Fuck You you sniveling little shitstain. I should have not even wasted my time playing along with you here.
with no mention of war then get Pissy at me for taking that argument at face value?
You expect me to talk about war on an open forum?
You're some kind of stupid, aren't you?
me clearly talking about building separatist societies to survive and thrive in the war game scenario with the options you laid out. So Fuck You you sniveling little shitstain.
No I don't think I'll let you walk it back. You weren't talking about 'separatism'. You were talking about continued white flight. Let not confuse the two.
You want to keep retreating, be my fucking guest. All of us that are done retreating will hold the line without you.
After all, how well did Waco and Ruby ridge work out?
- white flight (check). 2. separatist community (check).
Ends the same way every time.
The only utility in those is manufacturing martyrs.
But personally I'd rather not see any more whites die, including you.
And thats why I vote for no retreat.
Words from a brainlet who got upset the crowd wont just automagically agree with his opinion despite all his effort to make the options lead into the answer he wanted in the first place.
If you wanted option 5 to be a "civil war" to retake control of the place people lived in you should have been more clear in the first place and not acted like a pissy little bitch when people make arguments based on what YOU wrote. Stop acting like a woman, people wont read your mind.
No I think what I did was changed the meaning of it after the fact. I'm sound boarding and not 100% sure what I'm getting at until I hash it out sometimes with others.
So if I'm ambiguous just realize I don't always know what the fuck I'm talking about. ~~Sometimes ~~ A lot of times it's just spitballing.
Reminder I said "The real best answer is all but 1. " but you want to ignore that because you already decided I am a kike, amazing the temper tantrum when the comments did not stroke your ego.
(post is archived)