Option 5 is useless. Voting is a rigged system that is disconnected from we the people. You can start another party and it will be a certainty that it will never win any office because the one party system is in control. If voting worked, we wouldn't be allowed to do it.
Option 5 allows you to consolidate angry people.
It gives you room to splinter political power by bringing sherrifs associations.
And it acts as organizational cover.
It's the basic premise asians elaborated on when they talked about the competition between open and closed systems.
That aside its a longshot.
Option 5 would be necessary to mitigate and undermine a false civil war narrative created by the secret police (FBI, CIA, DHS, , et al). Namely their attempts to establish two false sides, and decide leadership and place their own guys in the command&control hierarchy.
You can potentially politically co-opt such a movement by putting out messages that appeal to the demographic targeted by the regime--namely the ones they want to push into a conflict. And by co-opting the regime is forced to wind it down or go after you.
And then you have a grievance narrative to work with as long as you can get the demographic to identity with your political bloc.
it doesn't matter if you win elections. You're not going to. What matters is if you have public support, sympathies, and if they identify with the message.
it's how the oath-keepers recruited all the guys that they did (nevermind that their leadership is a farce.)
And its how I would do it too. Narrative co-option by pitch perfect political messaging.
We can't gain office.
However what we can do is
complicate their operations
disrupt their narratives
co-opt their political, social, economic, and other types of momentum
and raise the cost of forcing narratives and propaganda on the public
Agreeing with something is 'free real estate', least of all a movement and its supporters. If the government wants to lead the opposition against its own regime, we should lead the opposition better than them. message better. Recruit better.
Done right they'll waste enormous resources, just like they did with Q, to get their psy-op back on track. With the chance and opportunity that they fail, to our benefit.
Unless you want to fight a civil war and think you can win.
In which case I'd call you crazy.
In short, we need a new party.
And it has to be fire and brimstone type stuff. The sort of populist anger and nationalist fervor that raises the hairs on the back of DC insider' necks.
The time is right. The public sentiment is there. The support is there.
(post is archived)