Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

119

About the NYC nuclear attack PSA, u/snowdenisaspook posted over

Just came here to post this link. Exceptionally curious timing. Thanks for posting.

"exceptionally curious timing"

And I want to write a little about that.

This is a reaction thats expected in psychological operations. Expected and frequently exploited.

So if the question is "why the odd timing?" then the question becomes "why do they want you asking 'why the odd timing'?"

Because they want you to focus on this. Forcing a question like that, tends to have this effect.

Which means this is probably a distraction, or meant to throw us off.

And if the intent appears meant to cause us to ask such questions, it means this message is definitely meant for us (the non-mainstream crowd) as a demographic.

Meaning theres something else thats going to happen in the news, or is happening, that the regular public is seeing, but we're not paying attention to.

Why?

Because of this very propaganda out of NYC.

So the real question is, whats running in the regular news cycle that they don't want the non-mainstream to pay attention to? Can't be the hunter fiasco, because thats already public. Which means the hunter fiasco is also likely a distraction, or simply scandal-ammo for inter-faction fighting.

What do they not want us paying attention to or discussing?

About the NYC nuclear attack PSA, u/snowdenisaspook posted over [here](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/555151/60943058-2113-49b2-aba2-c928be2bfee6#cmnts) > Just came here to post this link. Exceptionally curious timing. Thanks for posting. "exceptionally curious timing" And I want to write a little about that. This is a reaction thats expected in psychological operations. Expected and frequently exploited. So if the question is "why the odd timing?" then the question *becomes* "why do they want you asking 'why the odd timing'?" Because they *want* you to focus on this. Forcing a question like that, tends to have this effect. Which means this is probably a distraction, or meant to throw us off. And if the intent appears meant to cause us to ask such questions, it means this message is definitely meant for *us* (the non-mainstream crowd) as a demographic. Meaning theres something else thats *going* to happen in the news, or *is* happening, that the regular public is seeing, but we're not paying attention to. Why? Because of this very propaganda out of NYC. So the real question is, whats running in the regular news cycle that they don't want the non-mainstream to pay attention to? Can't be the hunter fiasco, because thats already public. Which means the hunter fiasco is also likely a distraction, or simply scandal-ammo for inter-faction fighting. What do they not want us paying attention to or discussing?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 1 pt

Also there's an energy crisis in Europe from all the go green bs.

U.s. government is fully subverted. DNC entirely. RNC at about 80-90%. Bureucracy somewhere in the 90-98% range. Mostly israel and a certain asian nation. Israel is a proxy for british intelligence. Brits decided best course of action is either to push the anglosphere into the arms of russia, or someone decided they wanted to kill two birds with one stone, by pushing russia and the middle east into the arms of asia, while taking down the u.s.

Everyone will say "World War 3 has already started. It's obvious" and maybe it is, but doom mongering is aplenty, and has been for years. But if I had to guess, I'd say they got it right this time. WW3 really has started, and this is the semi-kinetic phase.

Also the president is out of country.

Wait what?

If thats true, then my suspicion that something big is going to happen in the next 2-4 weeks would be correct. Maybe texas or the east coast.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah he was just visiting Israel. Not sure if he's back yet or not.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah he was just visiting Israel. Not sure if he's back yet or not.

Hypothetically, if one wanted to take care of their business partners, israel, they'd negotiate a truce or treaty with saudi arabia for them, before cutting ties. The same saudis now aligning with russia and asia.

Not unlike telling people at a worksite to stand clear before the demolition of a building.

Or in this case, a nation.