WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Does anybody really think that the Supreme Court gives two shits about killing babies? I think a more likely explanation for the recent rulings is that the powers that be realized that it's extremely hypocritical to demand mandatory vaccines and at the same time allow abortion on the premise of "my body my choice". Without Roe v. Wade they took away a very strong defense against mandatory vaccination. Now I hear they are going to be re evaluating affirmative action? Right. The Supreme court just decided to do their jobs after taking half a century off. Seems to me they are stirring the pot, trying to incite division.

Does anybody really think that the Supreme Court gives two shits about killing babies? I think a more likely explanation for the recent rulings is that the powers that be realized that it's extremely hypocritical to demand mandatory vaccines and at the same time allow abortion on the premise of "my body my choice". Without Roe v. Wade they took away a very strong defense against mandatory vaccination. Now I hear they are going to be re evaluating affirmative action? Right. The Supreme court just decided to do their jobs after taking half a century off. Seems to me they are stirring the pot, trying to incite division.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

IMHO roe vs hoe was about: 1. the dont care about killing more gentle babies as most are going to die along with their parents shortly anyway

  1. they want to incite leftwing violence in the lead up to the mid terms.