Top notch my man
The u.s. was co-opted. And suberted. What year? I've been trying to determine that, precisely, for sometime now.
And now I know.
The year the u.s. was co-opted, everyone knows. 1913.
But the year the u.s. was subverted? When all the glohobomo agenda really began?
1988
A year that will live in infamy.
edit: Smedleys_Butler-1 has pointed out that blackrock was also started in 1988. Good catch Smedley.
FROM WHAT I GATHER The u.s. was taken over by the banks in 1913. They cemented control over voting on a macro scale with the passage of the 1965 immigration act to demographically block bust us. And the tech oligarchs, starting with CNN, founded in 1980, (and ending with modern social media and electronic banking) took over the minds of the public. Meanwhile the RINO Nixon took us off the gold standard after kissinger and the cia seized control of the executive branch through influence and pressure tactics, thus opening us up to financial destruction. Then george bush sr, appointed by the traitor gerald ford, used his job as head of the cia, to setup a presidential run in the 1980s. Ronald Reagan successfully beat him for a time in exchange for massive payouts to the military industrial complex, but bush eventually won, or stole it in 1988. And after that year on, we never had another real election again.
After that the cia rigged every single election, with the help of local democrat machines (and blackmail, bribes, and cooperation on the part of the RNC), who in turn used the street gangs and police unions to rig primaries. Not a single person in office is legitimate. When insiders wrote that its "all theater" they were having a little joke, because no one is allowed to run who is not either bribed or blackmailed. Not a single candidate with the exception of Trump, who bent the knee to israel because israel, early on built its own blackmail networks, realizing if they didn't, they would lose out to surrounding middle eastern countries in the coming decades (e.x. saudi arabia and iran). Effectively this was trump willing to side with Britain's vassal, israel, to beat the socialists that had taken over every aspect of america. What this boils down to is the global nation-state system fighting against those international banking forces that wanted to privatize all government, and consolidate it into a "stakeholder dictatorship".
Once in, george bush took over the executive, co-opting it with military intelligence (CIA, NSA, and FBI). You might understand this as the russian and asian explanation that "democratic and republican systems, being open, are prone to being infiltrated by closed systems." In otherwords, the talk of this happening recently, is really more of a description of what has already happened, decades ago. This is not really a new opinion, but has variously been presented by people like Greenwald, and others, claiming the intelligence agencies and federal bureaucracy have essentially "co-opted the executive, legislative, and most of the judicial branch."
This is why the downhill crash of america seemed to accelerate in the 90s.
By 2001, they locked in the security state, using new found secrecy to massively ramp up spying on congress, the senate, all americans, the heads of all major news agencies, banks, technology companies, anyone of importance at all. This was an exclusive window of operation for them, once 9/11 had happened, it was open season to use this to fully control elections, cut off and destroy any candidates they didn't like, bribe, blackmail, or threaten any news agency that didn't go along, any executives that spoke out, any NGO or element of government that didn't comply.
State secrets was the crux.
To ramp up this operation they began harvesting opium for the cia in afghanistan, trafficked through pakistan and india. oh, you thought we kept refusing to go to war with them for no reason? And when fentanyl (synthetic opioids) removed the need for afghan poppys, curious how suddenly we became a lot less friendly to pakistan, and a lot more friendly to india. From there it took an overland route, through myanmar (to launder the origin of it and fund other operations in the region), down through thailand, instead of by sea, because it would have taken longer and had to pass through singapore's waters. Philipines ran cutting and refining operations, acting as a final warehouse before distribution around the world. Columbia received it, because of american networks already setup there, and adjacency to panama. Panama was used for further distribution, some to mexico city (today mainly asian-origin precursor chemicals for meth and fent), and some of the opioids went on to cuba, where it was then cut, and reshipped to be imported in miami with the help, likely, of customs, and the police unions.
It's why the opioid epidemic hit the east coast and the midwest first.
The money from this was collected and handled at the low-level by prison and street gangs, many of whom were likely given 'CI' cover by the FBI, on orders of either the ADL or CIA. The reason being is because it is commonly understood israel has been used by the american intelligence deepstate as a laundering hub. CI cover on a large scale would make a perfect tool for keeping police departments off the large scale drug problems, which explains why nothing they did ever worked, not even to slow the growth of the drug epidemic. They were gimped from the start. This makes even more sense in light of reports that the FBI and other agencies had dedicated arms made of several tens of thousands of 'informants', some of whom had one and only one job, to create safehouses, fake ids, register transport, cars, and houses, in their names, for use by the various agencies for domestic operations.
This money went to further consolidating control and all sorts of assets. It went to worldwide operations. It went to domestic operations.
BUT BACK TO the recent present. The Late 80s and 90s:
George bush sr had naturally gone on to commit a coup, and subverted the executive, elections, and the cia, leaving a lot of his own behind to take orders after he left his position as head of the agency. These stay-behinds would be used, in combination with control of congress, and the senate, to install clinton.
Clinton would in turn, as agreed 'hand off' the presidency to george's son, george bush jr.
Once this initial handoff had succeeded, the new oligarchs were reasonably assured that the "new system" of power-sharing and rigged elections worked. Each person that was designated, would get their ride. This is why hillary clinton cried in 2016 that it was supposed to be "her turn".
They could now get on to their next move. Cementing this arrangement. And so came 9/11.
While this worked, they still had a problem. The u.s. was up to its eyeballs in debt and they would have to massively ramp up disenfranchisement in order to economically consolidate power. Worse, the public was armed, so it couldn't happen over night. First the middle class would have to be destroyed and they'd need a level of spying and control previously only dreamed of in the likes of brave new world and 1984.
They got that with obama in office, millions of jobs exported overseas in 2001-2005 thanks to romney and bain capital, and the engineered collapse of 2008, destroying the banking and real-estate markets. This would be important, because this was NOT the implosion they were seeking. This was only the spark on the fuse to a much bigger explosion.
What did this enable? For starters, it enabled infinite money printing. It was the go to line to fix our problem now that we were off gold-backed currency. Here blackrock, a major hedge fund, stepped in, to steer billions of u.s. bond purchases. Essentially hen the u.s. printed money, blackrock got first dibs, and decided the distribution or "investments."
Who was responsible for 2008? Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Freddie Mac, Merril Lynch, Citigroup (who rated many of the bad mortgages and securities fraud as not risky), and others. Who ran blackrock? Larry Fink. Who was a ceo of Bear Stearns? James Cayne. Who was a president of Merill Lynch? Nigel MacEwan Who was a head of citigroup's wealth management division? Sallie Krawcheck Who was a ceo of merill lynch? David Komansky Who was a head of bear stearns? Alan Schwartz Who was a ceo of citigroup? Sanford Weill Who was a ceo of Lehman Brothers? Richard S. Fuld Jr. Who was a director of blackrock? also David Komansky
What group did they all belong to? A fraternity called Kappa Beta Phi You can look it up here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kappa_Beta_Phi
So all these friends, in a fraternity, when on to run all these major firms, and collectively crashed the market. And then, who picked up the pieces? Their buddy running blackrock, Larry Fink.
Incidentally also part of this group was Ken Langone.
Kenneth Langone. Former chair of the New York Stock Exchange compensation committee Who was on the board of DTB Online Inc. A datamining company that worked for the FBI and DEA. It would go on to get a contract in florida, and supposedly (I've been unable to find any verification of this) have involvement with the florida election controversy that directly lead to the selection of george bush jr as president in 2000. Also incidentally, the co-founder of this company was pushed out by Kenneth Langone, when Langone That co-founder, Hank Asher, would go on to develop the precursor of MATRIX for the NSA. Yes, the 'threat matrix scoring system' famously revealed by Edward Snowden.
All of this followed from 9/11
Back to 2008 though.
After the crash, with the midwest wrecked by opioids, the export of manufacturing in 2005, and the destruction of the mortgage industry, there was no going back.
An entire generation went into service jobs or went to college, and onto jobs in massive bureaucracy, or 'civil servants' like teaching, which bloated the public unions.
2008 guaranteed the reelection of obama in 2012.
With the middle class' future effectively destroyed, the eight years between obamas reelection, and trumps, would see the demoralization of the last two generations, at the same time as the rise of algorithmically-designed mass leftwing radicalization. Government and wallstreet had created a problem. And they had a solution: radical change, even if it required riots and civil war. The only problem would be getting people dissatisfied (and young and impressionable enough) to support it.
What they didn't count on was the whiplash of 2008 and 2012 leading to widespread belief in total disenfranchisement from the right, combine with the increasing radicalism of the pro-regime 'left' and the total and generally treacherous out-of-touch arrogance of DC's own RNC.
Thus entered a political outsider, fueled by a discontent Israel, who saw the pro-iranian and pro-palestinian bent of the left as an eventual threat.
So we got hope an change, but in a red-tie package. And as should have been expected, it mostly boiled down to MIGA. They didn't give him much to work with. The doled out RNC support just enough to get what they wanted, while carefully adjusting it to assure no swamp draining would occur. Regardless, under him we saw both the launch of a bioweapon, whether the u.s. did it to affect mass socialist change, or israel, or a certain asian nation, has been argued ever since. The fact was someone wanted massive social change in america to destroy america and all that it ever was or will be.
(post is archived)