Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

921

So now all of a sudden tenure of a legal ruling matters. I was under the impression that old rules needed to be updated to suit modern needs. Fucking hypocrites. Not even worth the breath to argue with them.

So now all of a sudden tenure of a legal ruling matters. I was under the impression that old rules needed to be updated to suit modern needs. Fucking hypocrites. Not even worth the breath to argue with them.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Madness! They are arguing that the court took away a "right" that never was.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

>Never has the supreme court ruled on taking away a right

Another good one.

[–] • 2 pts

Fuck them. Not a genuine bone in their bodies.

[–] • 1 pt

The idea that old rules need to be updated is at best just plain wrong. *When the language is intentionally broad to cause meaningful adaptation to not become outdated *ex: "arms" not "muskets"