Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

651

A lot of these shooters are under the age of 21, very immature and emotionally undeveloped. They are just kids and the amount of growth between 18 and 21 can and often is substantial. I think this would actually prevent fairly large percentage of these mass shootings. For this to be dealt you must also raise the age of military consent to 21. Raising the age of firearms purchase while still expanding children to go kill in war at 18 is asking too much. If the age of both was raised to 21 I would support it.

A lot of these shooters are under the age of 21, very immature and emotionally undeveloped. They are just kids and the amount of growth between 18 and 21 can and often is substantial. I think this would actually prevent fairly large percentage of these mass shootings. For this to be dealt you must also raise the age of military consent to 21. Raising the age of firearms purchase while still expanding children to go kill in war at 18 is asking too much. If the age of both was raised to 21 I would support it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (27).
[–] • 6 pts

Shall not be infringed.

That is the end of the discussion. I will not support any further restriction of a man's rights.

History teaches us that good parenting and home education can solve the problems we are currently facing. Children, grade school age, used to be handed guns to carry to school because its firearm training day.

Then we got niggers unleashed by jews.

However --- Everything you said isnt without merit.

I agree that, telling a man that at 18 he is old enough to make the choice to sign his life over to the government in a contract of what amounts to indentured servitude as a bullet sponge. Then telling that same man, he isnt old enough to be responsible for this or that...

The dichotomy screams at me.

Are they, or aren't they, responsible enough to make life altering decisions at 18? We have to choose one or the other, we should not expect to have both.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

You can’t buy cigarettes until you are 21, dumbass

[–] • 2 pts

That's part of the fucking problem, as I have clearly stated above. Are you too fucking retarded to understand simple fucking words?

Go suck on a bag of assholes you fucking hunk of nigger shit. Cigs should be plain fucking destroyed, smokers fucking stink.

[–] • 0 pt

Go back a few years ago and you could be 18 to buy tobacco products. No the age shouldnt be raised. Ive had my guns in my room years before i was 18. as far as mass shooters, i thought most of them hovered around the age 21. Hello. Las vegas shooter was in his 50s. Average age of a dui is 30 years old. Dont tell me its the age. Alcohol is way eaiser to get than a gun. And you get a license at the age of 16.