Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

192

Or less than a month away from direct, public, u.s. military involvement in the war against russia.

When I say "public" I don't mean in the sense that we're already involved. The discussion sites, chans, etc, are already aware of this.

I mean 'public' as in official, acknowledged action and policy by the u.s.

I think the civilian component will attempt to take it right to the brink without going over it, and then the DoD will sabotage that by going over the line.

Forgetting the actual date range for a moment, lets just discuss the motives:

The administration needs any reason, any at all, to distract from covid, and assume additional emergency powers. It thinks it can do this by taking us to the very edge of war.

The military, which, you may be surprised to learn, is in an internal power struggle with the civilian government. It also has every reason to see the war escalate, because this provides an opportunity for it to expand its own emergency powers, and utilize those.

In short, I think they are planning a counter-coup. And for this to happen, a direct confrontation would have to occur between the u.s. and russia.

If the pentagon concluded, that the civil government's power comes from the manufactured consent of the cities, it is not hard to conclude that a large scale war with russia would be a net-benefit to the military faction. The cities would be destroyed, in ruins, and that much more reliant on the red states and military because only the military is organized enough to respond to such a disaster as attacks on u.s. homeland after starting a major war with russia or a certain asian nation.

Historically, coups (and thats what 2008-2020 was), always lead to counter-coups.

I think this is that.

Or less than a month away from direct, public, u.s. military involvement in the war against russia. When I say "public" I don't mean in the sense that we're already involved. The discussion sites, chans, etc, are already aware of this. I mean 'public' as in official, acknowledged action and policy by the u.s. I think the civilian component will attempt to take it right to the brink without going over it, and then the DoD will sabotage that by going over the line. Forgetting the actual date range for a moment, lets just discuss the motives: The administration needs any reason, any at all, to distract from covid, and assume additional emergency powers. It thinks it can do this by taking us to the very edge of war. The military, which, you may be surprised to learn, is in an internal power struggle with the civilian government. It also has every reason to see the war escalate, because this provides an opportunity for it to expand its *own* emergency powers, and utilize those. In short, I think they are planning a counter-coup. And for this to happen, a direct confrontation would have to occur between the u.s. and russia. If the pentagon concluded, that the civil government's power comes from the manufactured consent of the cities, it is not hard to conclude that a large scale war with russia would be a net-benefit to the military faction. The cities would be destroyed, in ruins, and that much more reliant on the red states and military because only the military is organized enough to respond to such a disaster as attacks on u.s. homeland after starting a major war with russia or a certain asian nation. Historically, coups (and thats what 2008-2020 was), always lead to counter-coups. I think this is that.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 0 pt

Yeah you lost me there buddy…of course they know how vulnerable the U.S.,

I think they know it is in the absolute sense. But I think enough of them are in their own bubble that they're not 100% certain that a big move now isn't still very risky.

What I'm saying is they're way overestimating the risk and cost based on the "wounded cornered animal" theory of conflict. Makes perfect sense, considering thats one of Sun Tzus core tenets "always leave your enemy an exit or else they will fight back twice as hard."

But past certain point of no return, this rule inverts.

I know they can win this, but they aren't sure they can. its less about them not being fully aware of the precarious state america is in, and more about their risk-aversion over-estimating the risk and cost of the implication.

A good strong infrastructure attack on the u.s. right now, by a foreign power, would kill us outright as a superpower. Thats it. Thats where america is right now.

Achilles heel fully up for strike and they keep worrying "what if we miss, or dont cut deep enough?"

When, if they wait, theres a very good chance, this vulnerability will be fixed and never prevent itself again.

Which is why I've wrote in other posts "america is likely, going into this century, the weakest it will ever be, assuming it doesn't first collapse."