Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Or less than a month away from direct, public, u.s. military involvement in the war against russia.

When I say "public" I don't mean in the sense that we're already involved. The discussion sites, chans, etc, are already aware of this.

I mean 'public' as in official, acknowledged action and policy by the u.s.

I think the civilian component will attempt to take it right to the brink without going over it, and then the DoD will sabotage that by going over the line.

Forgetting the actual date range for a moment, lets just discuss the motives:

The administration needs any reason, any at all, to distract from covid, and assume additional emergency powers. It thinks it can do this by taking us to the very edge of war.

The military, which, you may be surprised to learn, is in an internal power struggle with the civilian government. It also has every reason to see the war escalate, because this provides an opportunity for it to expand its own emergency powers, and utilize those.

In short, I think they are planning a counter-coup. And for this to happen, a direct confrontation would have to occur between the u.s. and russia.

If the pentagon concluded, that the civil government's power comes from the manufactured consent of the cities, it is not hard to conclude that a large scale war with russia would be a net-benefit to the military faction. The cities would be destroyed, in ruins, and that much more reliant on the red states and military because only the military is organized enough to respond to such a disaster as attacks on u.s. homeland after starting a major war with russia or a certain asian nation.

Historically, coups (and thats what 2008-2020 was), always lead to counter-coups.

I think this is that.

Or less than a month away from direct, public, u.s. military involvement in the war against russia. When I say "public" I don't mean in the sense that we're already involved. The discussion sites, chans, etc, are already aware of this. I mean 'public' as in official, acknowledged action and policy by the u.s. I think the civilian component will attempt to take it right to the brink without going over it, and then the DoD will sabotage that by going over the line. Forgetting the actual date range for a moment, lets just discuss the motives: The administration needs any reason, any at all, to distract from covid, and assume additional emergency powers. It thinks it can do this by taking us to the very edge of war. The military, which, you may be surprised to learn, is in an internal power struggle with the civilian government. It also has every reason to see the war escalate, because this provides an opportunity for it to expand its *own* emergency powers, and utilize those. In short, I think they are planning a counter-coup. And for this to happen, a direct confrontation would have to occur between the u.s. and russia. If the pentagon concluded, that the civil government's power comes from the manufactured consent of the cities, it is not hard to conclude that a large scale war with russia would be a net-benefit to the military faction. The cities would be destroyed, in ruins, and that much more reliant on the red states and military because only the military is organized enough to respond to such a disaster as attacks on u.s. homeland after starting a major war with russia or a certain asian nation. Historically, coups (and thats what 2008-2020 was), always lead to counter-coups. I think this is that.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 0 pt

Probably right around elections.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Probably right around elections.

If it does happen, I think it would be sooner than that.

Look at the cycle time between the covid, ukraine, musk, and now abortion crisis narrative.

The big issues would be the primaries and run offs of texas and california. That would tell them which way the narrative needs to go.

And that assumes the elections aren't on lock and manufactured.

If they are, then theres no conflict between the parties, which means the foreign-owned faction (the DNC) and the domestic owned faction (pentagon, RNC), are actually false and theres not actually a power conflict going on between them.

If the elections aren't on lock, then the power struggle is real, and some sort of false flag is guaranteed (assuming the regime can lose).

If the power struggle is real, then the elections aren't on lock. Which means we can assume a false flag will occur. But that in-itself is rarely a reliable indicator, because so many false flags predicted, don't end up happening. Usually it boils down to a redoubling of existing narratives.

What would those narratives be?

  1. "deadly new variant" -> new lockdowns

  2. "russia" -> we go to war in ukraine or adjacent nation

  3. "muh j6 insurrection" -> "full blown white supremacist insurgency" -> new mass spying/dissident crackdowns (larger than j6).

Can't be the economy, because the regime is holding on by a thread in that field. And in that regard, an infrastructure attack would be unlikely, hence a false flag of that nature would be unlikely.

I think they thought that "covid bioexercises leading to covid" would reinforce the notion that similar exercises, like cyberpolygon would become a real event too. Which tells me it might have been a bluff, and this has been a pretty reliable (though not entirely) mode of thinking for me. The state mostly bluffs and fearmongers, with a generous helping of manufactured events that are purely media spectacle rather than real things.

Going on the basis that they need the economy to putter along for a 'soft reset', cyberpolygon wont happen, or at least not on a large scale. If it does, then it'd probably be a regional thing, that "coincidentally" happens in places they want it to happen, at times convenient to the regime: like taking down a whole state, which prevents electronic ballot recounts, or delays elections of various offices, or temporarily shuts down banks right as congress is authorizing digital IDs as "safety measures against hacking and terrorism and fraud and hatespeech." Also lets them implement banking holidays, or shutting down dissident movements from fund raising, while remaining blameless.

The crisis cycle is definitely accelerating though.

[–] • 1 pt

A large "hack" during the election period would give them the ability to claim it's illegitimacy no matter who "wins".

The voting data could be destroyed or manufactured easily enough at that point.

Couple this with a large "hack" to the banking sector or the social security database or both and social security numbers could become almost useless.

The population at this point would be spiraling and prepped for the "grass roots" rising of a party with a strong promising leader.

Someone who is perhaps technologically savvy and willing to spend their money to help save the country.

Or none of that will happen.

The current state of affairs will not be able to continue indefinitely however.

[–] • 1 pt

A large "hack" during the election period would give them the ability to claim it's illegitimacy no matter who "wins".

But thats playbook at this point.

You spin an at least plausible narrative. You should write novels as a hobby.