Everyone should be Free to make a Fool of Them-self
-Ben Franklin
Everyone should be Free to make a Fool of Them-self
-Ben Franklin
Twitter?? Dude
Twitter?? Dude
Twitter is designed the way to allow free speech to everybody,
lol You forgot to take your pills again, I see.
> Twitter is designed the way to allow free speech to everybody,
lol You forgot to take your pills again, I see.
I only take red-pills, and they're all suppositories
I only take red-pills, and they're all suppositories
WTF? Dude, blue pills are suppositories that keep people asleep.
WTF? Dude, blue pills are suppositories that keep people asleep.
How did you wake up?
How did you wake up?
I get what his point is meant to be. Twitter is, at surface level, designed to allow users to only see content from people they want to. At face value, this gives the ability to create what OP is describing.
It is a flawed analogy, for obvious reasons. There are other factors at play like (((AI))) which artificially limit the possible interactions, and flood you with other shit you don't want to see.
I get what his point is meant to be. Twitter is, at surface level, designed to allow users to only see content from people they want to. At face value, this gives the ability to create what OP is describing.
It is a flawed analogy, for obvious reasons. There are other factors at play like (((AI))) which artificially limit the possible interactions, and flood you with other shit you don't want to see.
Twatter free speech was an illusion, from the start. I don't remember them claiming they were pro free-speech ever.
You don't catch flies with vinegar.
They then put their real plan to control the compliant masses into application, once they got them captive.
Twatter free speech was an illusion, from the start. I don't remember them claiming they were pro free-speech ever.
You don't catch flies with vinegar.
They then put their real plan to control the compliant masses into application, once they got them captive.
I didn’t even check when it first started and I made my account. I just assumed it let you do whatever until you became a problem. But back then you had to have a decent amount of money to get online. And it worked through sms, that’s why it started with 140 characters. (SMS data limit was 140).
I can’t seem to go back more than 3 or 4 years in the twitter feeds. And search engines don’t seem to go back more than 10 years- it should atleast point to wayback/archive.
I didn’t even check when it first started and I made my account. I just assumed it let you do whatever until you became a problem. But back then you had to have a decent amount of money to get online. And it worked through sms, that’s why it started with 140 characters. (SMS data limit was 140).
I can’t seem to go back more than 3 or 4 years in the twitter feeds. And search engines don’t seem to go back more than 10 years- it should atleast point to wayback/archive.
Not disagreeing with that.
The point remains. Twitter sells itself as a platform where you can achieve was OP is talking about.
Not disagreeing with that.
The point remains. Twitter sells itself as a platform where you can achieve was OP is talking about.
I'm talking about design, not ownership. Twitter was designed in order to have only self moderation. Twitter become censored shithole only because of the wonership.
I'm talking about design, not ownership. Twitter was designed in order to have only self moderation. Twitter become censored shithole only because of the wonership.
lol Never mind, just don't take them, you're funnier that way.
lol Never mind, just don't take them, you're funnier that way.
Twitter is not designed for free speech because AI determines what reality you are presented with.
You are correct that homogenaity is crucial to a harmoniously functioning community.
P2P is the only real solution to what you're talking about. In a p2p model, you get to decide for yourself what you want to interact with on any platform/service/website. This is because everyone is a client&server in a p2p model. You don't like some fag node, you can block it from communicating with you or your network.
Twitter is not designed for free speech because AI determines what reality you are presented with.
You are correct that homogenaity is crucial to a harmoniously functioning community.
P2P is the only real solution to what you're talking about. In a p2p model, you get to decide for yourself what you want to interact with on any platform/service/website. This is because everyone is a client&server in a p2p model. You don't like some fag node, you can block it from communicating with you or your network.
(((AI)))
(((AI)))
Artificial Intelligence in nothing compared to the power of my Artificial Retardation
Artificial Intelligence in nothing compared to the power of my Artificial Retardation
Twitter is designed the way to allow free speech to everybody
No its not but Elon seems to be aiming to provide this.
Since degenerates exist in our society, freedom of speech is impossible
Incorrect, it is democracy that is impossible. When 51% are NPC and brainwashed then the other 49% who aren't get fucked over.
> Twitter is designed the way to allow free speech to everybody
No its not but Elon seems to be aiming to provide this.
> Since degenerates exist in our society, freedom of speech is impossible
Incorrect, it is democracy that is impossible. When 51% are NPC and brainwashed then the other 49% who aren't get fucked over.
Zeronet is what you might be looking for.
Bitcoin BitTorrent based web pages that stay up as long as someone that acceded it stays online.
There’s a talk thread, and you can block individual nyms. Or subscribe to a blocklist.
Zeronet is what you might be looking for.
Bitcoin BitTorrent based web pages that stay up as long as someone that acceded it stays online.
There’s a talk thread, and you can block individual nyms. Or subscribe to a blocklist.
A large part of Twitter's design is censorship.
A large part of Twitter's design is censorship.
(post is archived)