Valid point. Using groomer, is a very small nudge in most peoples mind to move them from saying pedophile.
I think most blue-pilled people don't know what's the meaning of "groomers" in that specific context.
So using it will raise more questions, and that's where the red pill is dropped.
"Groomer" should be used on those blue-pilled liberals that support homosexual/transsexual normalization. "Pedophile" should be used instead of homosexual, transsexual or any of those bizarre lgbtq+ spectrums.
They want to push the Overton Window to minimize the stigma of being labeled a pedophile to the less innocuous sounding "groomer"? Then we need to push it the other way to stigmatize all liberals as GROOMERS who endorse the corruption of children by homosexual pedophiles.
Liberal / Leftist = Groomer. LGBTQ+ = Pedophile.
In my mind anyone supporting pedophilia is one. The are just as guilty even more than the actual pedo because without their blind support they would not exist.
That's not a bad idea at all.
(post is archived)