WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

853

I went through the sewers because i wanted to see how these people answered the question. summary of answers: not even an answer: what about whatever 1 in a million syndrome answers: 1.-if you think it's a woman when you encounter them then it's a woman. this one seems to me like it would introduce a new category of woman. "woman in passing but not if you look any closer". also this definition brings internal strife because some other wacko will appear and tell them that no, you don't need to present in any way in order to be a woman, which is hilarious. 2.-a woman is anyone that sincerely thinks they are a woman. a whackamadoo is anyone that sincerely thinks they are a whackamadoo, congratulations you've successfully eliminated the concept of womanhood. 3.- "they're only trying to define "woman" so they can have a way to exclude people from womanhood. let it be nebulous." these people are seriously twisted 4.-i don't care i don't need to explain why going through treatment to become something you don't even care to define is insane. 5.- "woman" is a made up term again, twisted. also something i don't see mentioned enough is the fact that this identity they are creating is dependent on the pharmaceutical industry. fun fact about women: they don't start turning into men when the supply chain of hormone therapy fails. i know i'm preaching to the choir here but the answers i encountered still surprised me because they really, really seem to hate the fact that women exist. i genuinely expected at least some good faith answers in there.

I went through the sewers because i wanted to see how these people answered the question. summary of answers: not even an answer: what about whatever 1 in a million syndrome answers: 1.-if you think it's a woman when you encounter them then it's a woman. this one seems to me like it would introduce a new category of woman. "woman in passing but not if you look any closer". also this definition brings internal strife because some other wacko will appear and tell them that no, you don't need to present in any way in order to be a woman, which is hilarious. 2.-a woman is anyone that sincerely thinks they are a woman. a whackamadoo is anyone that sincerely thinks they are a whackamadoo, congratulations you've successfully eliminated the concept of womanhood. 3.- "they're only trying to define "woman" so they can have a way to exclude people from womanhood. let it be nebulous." these people are seriously twisted 4.-i don't care i don't need to explain why going through treatment to become something you don't even care to define is insane. 5.- "woman" is a made up term again, twisted. also something i don't see mentioned enough is the fact that this identity they are creating is dependent on the pharmaceutical industry. fun fact about women: they don't start turning into men when the supply chain of hormone therapy fails. i know i'm preaching to the choir here but the answers i encountered still surprised me because they really, really seem to hate the fact that women exist. i genuinely expected at least some good faith answers in there.

(post is archived)