Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

217

This is a strange decision. Elon Musk cannot be unaware that he alone cannot change anything, because Twitter is completely owned by libtards, including the founder. He is one of the richest people on the planet. It is easier for him to create a new social network where he will be able to ensure freedom of speech for 100%.

This is a strange decision. Elon Musk cannot be unaware that he alone cannot change anything, because Twitter is completely owned by libtards, including the founder. He is one of the richest people on the planet. It is easier for him to create a new social network where he will be able to ensure freedom of speech for 100%.

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Buy up a controlling percentage of Twitter replace the board of board of directors and put in place better policies and fire all the trannies amd faggot ass liberals. That might take less time money than starting up your own social media platform.

[–] • 2 pts

Honestly, I’m getting tired of all these new social media platforms. There’s gab, parler, gettr , truth social, Twitter, and a lot more. And every time someone has a problem with Twitter they just want to make another one. Nothing is wrong with gab.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Look at the fucking communist here complaining about choice! You’re free to use whichever you want. Welcome to America chink.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I’m not complaining about choice, I’m complaining about us being all divided into the separate platforms. Andrew torba is a great guy who is unrelenting about free speech, we all need to get behind him and stop splintering ourselves off in 1000 different ways. More than anything I’m frustrated that people keep forgetting about gab. Everyone wants to make a new platform, but what’s wrong with gab?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I was reading Art of the Deal by DJT a while ago, and some surprising things happened as he bought more and more stock in Hilton. Musk could be using the fear of a takeover to leverage some other outcome.

All of this is way over my head, which is probably why I found the Hilton situation so fascinating.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

This is wrong tactic. You can't negotiate with degenerate perverts.

[–] • 1 pt

You can't negotiate with degenerate perverts.

Well this is just your abject retardation showing.

Of course you can.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

What makes you think Musk isn't one? Granted, I hold a minority opinion about the depravity of humanity, our need for a divine savior, etc.

So in my eyes, they're all a bunch of satan's offspring, doing what comes naturally.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I know he is not normal. He is divorced. As easy as it gets.

[–] • 1 pt

It's a jew move and a smart move. Normally when jews move in and take over their companies, the cons leave and try to start something new. Very difficult to start something new. Better to take over something established with a brand. Think taking over disney v starting a new disney alternative.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Yeah, it's a huge uphill battle to reform Twitter. It's not just SJWs that have infested it, it's vast sums of money from corporations and governments at whose behest they censor or trend certain topics. I can't imagine Elon calling for a free speech twitter and going up against all that corruption and succeeding. As the saying goes, when you fight corruption, corruption fights back.

[–] • 0 pt

Starting a new thing specifically to be free speech tends to not work out well enough to go mainsteam. Gab, Parler, Rumble, etc...here...they all get taken over by certain political elements that scare away casuals. Most people just want cat pics and pop culture and will take censorship and rules over dealing with a barrage of politics they don't like. Very diffilcult to build an influential "free speech" platform. Much easier to take a mainstram one over and backdoor such policies in. Musk doesn't have to control the whole thing to have considerable influence on the board.