Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

782

Q says "gold will end the fed."

How in the world can we simply switch over to the gold standard (which we need) without complete pandemonium?

You feel me on this?

And if you don't want to remain calm, then you are a gay homosexual and I think you know it.

I got one youtube clip of a guy saying it can be done. I'll have to re-watch it.

As for my complaint, remember, a skilled sailor uses all winds, side winds and even behind winds, to get to shore.

Q says "gold will end the fed." How in the world can we simply switch over to the gold standard (which we need) without complete pandemonium? You feel me on this? And if you don't want to remain calm, then you are a gay homosexual and I think you know it. I got one youtube clip of a guy saying it can be done. I'll have to re-watch it. As for my complaint, remember, a skilled sailor uses all winds, side winds and even behind winds, to get to shore.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Seems to me there is a lack of real world gold to handle the amount of shekels in circulation just in the USA alone.

[–] • 0 pt

But who do you / we trust, on the amount of gold.

Anyway, it's supposedly just a revaluation of whatever gold exists.

It just seems, there's no way to do it without extreme complications and unintended consequences.

I would love to avoid the coming fiat meltdown, I have kids who are just starting to get on with their lives, etc.

[–] • 2 pts

Wouldn't a gay homosexual be... a straight?

[–] • 1 pt

Okay, I think I'm seeing that one cancels the other. Shucks.

Listen, my wife calls me a gullible skeptic, because I'm a conspiracy nut, but I tell her those two terms cancel each other out.

I would appreciate it if you were on my side.

[–] • 1 pt

I ain't getting nowhere near any of your parts, I ain't no queer!

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

But are you a gay homosexual? One doesn't cancel the other out.

[–] • 1 pt

Don't care how it happens. But I'll keep stacking for when it does. Better than worthless fiat or ponzi stocks.

[–] • 0 pt

>newscoup, liberty daily, and rantingly is better then liberal drudge report. Q was/is a AI algorithm and failed in the end.

[–] • 0 pt

My goodness where did you get that name...

And it sounds like, indeed, you are missing the point as well.

I forewarned this would aggravate me and it has.

For that, I am not upvoting you.

[–] • 1 pt

>Never let a internet users opinion "get you aggravated" check out those sites, and make your own opinion about them. Constructive discussions are best.

[–] • 0 pt

Just messing wit you mate..

Yes, I know of one of them, I'll check them out, thanks.

[–] • 0 pt

bunch of nonsense.

Of course they use behind winds, that's how you get where you're going!! That's how sailing works!!

[–] • 0 pt

I'm still laughing about this (you're right)!

[–] • 1 pt

Ha. Now I'm laughing again!!!

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I actually very much appreciated what you said. "In the multitude of counselors there is safety."

The "behind winds" came from a puritan quote in the 17th century, for some reason he used a term very similar to it.

But maybe (whatever that term was, now I'm not sure but it was indeed similar, need to find it again) to folks back then (well obviously), they understood it to mean 'contrary' winds.

(That would of course, logically speaking, mean front winds, winds that are against you.)

So I should have obviously switched to a term that would make sense for our present time, which would be, wala, 'contrary.'

Doh.

If this makes sense...I'm still half asleep. Or is it half awake..