WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

989

I'm not talking about something that's known and shouldn't need proof. But dubious claims of new information? Trust but

VERIFY

As seen; https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/480714/82e3cb99-f998-48b9-9c6f-1b00461fb401#cmnts = https://archive.md/6tMNB https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/480714/c4fc92ee-138e-40d3-b43a-dc11b0b229b8#cmnts = https://archive.md/UHMBC https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/480714/df9894fb-3f93-426d-b27d-f07037a1ed62#cmnts = https://archive.md/IVMpD

Of note; This is NOT the same as denying someone's claim when they post and refuse to post proof. The most obvious example currently being that of covid19 existing and requesting verified, sourced, independent proof of such.

I'm not talking about something that's known and shouldn't need proof. But dubious claims of new information? Trust but #**VERIFY** As seen; https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/480714/82e3cb99-f998-48b9-9c6f-1b00461fb401#cmnts = https://archive.md/6tMNB https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/480714/c4fc92ee-138e-40d3-b43a-dc11b0b229b8#cmnts = https://archive.md/UHMBC https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/480714/df9894fb-3f93-426d-b27d-f07037a1ed62#cmnts = https://archive.md/IVMpD Of note; This is **NOT** the same as denying someone's claim when they post and refuse to post proof. The most obvious example currently being that of covid19 existing and requesting verified, sourced, independent proof of such.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

I see that you have sourced this post but none of those sources are peer-reviewed so you're a kike.

[–] 3 pts
[–] 0 pt

Hi Rabbi

[–] 0 pt

It should be a rule that if you do not provide sources then you are automatically banned for 10 days.

[–] 0 pt

Nah. I'm not going to prove a claim that the holocaust is a jewish lie. I'm not going to prove a claim that blacks have easy lives. etc.