Liberals go full retard again. the proposed measure removes all of those exceptions. It would therefore be a crime, under this proposal, to slaughter livestock for food, or to kill rats, mice, or other vermin and pests…a felony punishable by up to five years in prison, a $125,000 fine, or both.

368

•

Ballot initiative ip13 for Oregon and ip16 for Colorado(at the bottom).

Even taking your livestock out of state to be slaughtered would be a crime, just slaughtering a cow to feed your own family, transporting animals, eating animals killed within the state or killing rats and mice could end up with you in jail for five years and/or a $125,000 fine.

Under ORS 167.320, it is a crime, and may be a felony, to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause serious physical injury to an animal, or to cruelly cause the death of an animal, subject to the same exceptions included in ORS 167.315 and 167.335. Once again, the proposed measure removes all of those exceptions. It would therefore be a crime, under this proposal, to slaughter livestock for food, or to kill rats, mice, or other vermin and pests.

the rats and mice in the burbs have become so bad from the homeless camps, without control they’d overrun everyone’s home.

ORS 167.333 makes sexual assault of an animal a felony. As currently defined, the crime applies to touching of the mouth, anus, or sex organs of an animal for the purpose arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of a person. The statute does not apply to the use of animal products, and thus allows, for example, artificial insemination. The proposed measure would make many current practices for breeding pets, livestock, and horses a criminal offense.

The proposed measure would thus criminalize many common farming and ranching practices, as well as recreational and commercial hunting, fishing, and trapping, pest control, and many other practices that are now specifically authorized by law.

Insane. It’s the feudal system, it’s the kings animals and don’t kill any otherwise you’ll be imprisoned.

Summary: Under current law, many activities that do or may kill or injure animals are lawful, including animal husbandry practices; slaughtering livestock and poultry; animal breeding practices; fishing, hunting, and trapping; wildlife management practices; rodeos; scientific and agricultural research and teaching; control of vermin and nuisance animals; reasonable handling, training techniques. Proposed measure would make those practices, and other common practices involving animals, criminal offenses if injury/ death occurs. Criminalizes animal breeding practices for domestic, livestock, and equine animals that involve touching the mouth, anus, or sexual organs of the animal. Exception for “good veterinary practices” (undefined), self-defense. Applies to mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish. Elimination of hunting/ fishing licenses would remove funding from wildlife conservation efforts by Department of Fish and Wildlife. Other provisions.

Even rodeos.

it is a misdemeanor to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly injure an animal. Good animal husbandry practices are exempted, as are numerous practices set forth in ORS 167.335, including transportation of animals; rodeos; growing of poultry; the slaughter of animals by methods authorized by law; fishing, hunting, and trapping; lawful wildlife management; lawful scientific or agricultural research; control of vermin or pests; and reasonable handling and training techniques. The proposed measure removes all of those exceptions.

If passed, IP13 would effectively shut down the state’s meat production. While Oregonians could still purchase meat imported from other states, eating home-grown animals would become a felony punishable by up to five years in prison, a $125,000 fine, or both

http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2022/013cbt.pdf

Colorado:

Grass-roots activists are recruiting volunteers and starting to gather signatures for IP13 and Colorado’s Initiative 16, both of which would redefine artificial insemination and castration of livestock as sexual assault. Oregon’s proposal would also criminalize the slaughter of livestock, while Colorado’s would prevent it until the animal has lived at least one-quarter of its natural lifespan, which for cattle would be about five years.

Among the latest is American Agri-Women, whose president, Karolyn Zurn, said on April 27 the Colorado proposal “is deceiving the voters to achieve an anti-meat agenda.”

At least Colorado’s is only anti-meat, Oregon’s also lets rodents run rampant which would cause all kinds of diseases.

http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2022/013cbt.pdf

https://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/2021/11/opinion-anti-hunting-ranching-initiative-would-devastate-oregons-family-farms.html

https://www.farmprogress.com/livestock/national-animal-groups-shun-oregon-colorado-initiatives

Ballot initiative ip13 for Oregon and ip16 for Colorado(at the bottom). Even taking your livestock out of state to be slaughtered would be a crime, just slaughtering a cow to feed your own family, transporting animals, eating animals killed within the state or killing rats and mice could end up with you in jail for five years and/or a $125,000 fine. >Under ORS 167.320, it is a crime, and may be a felony, to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause serious physical injury to an animal, or to cruelly cause the death of an animal, subject to the same exceptions included in ORS 167.315 and 167.335. **Once again, the proposed measure removes all of those exceptions. It would therefore be a crime, under this proposal, to slaughter livestock for food, or to kill rats, mice, or other vermin and pests**. the rats and mice in the burbs have become so bad from the homeless camps, without control they’d overrun everyone’s home. >ORS 167.333 makes sexual assault of an animal a felony. As currently defined, the crime applies to touching of the mouth, anus, or sex organs of an animal for the purpose arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of a person. **The statute does not apply to the use of animal products, and thus allows, for example, artificial insemination. The proposed measure would make many current practices for breeding pets, livestock, and horses a criminal offense**. >**The proposed measure would thus criminalize many common farming and ranching practices, as well as recreational and commercial hunting, fishing, and trapping, pest control, and many other practices that are now specifically authorized by law**. Insane. It’s the feudal system, it’s the kings animals and don’t kill any otherwise you’ll be imprisoned. >**Summary: Under current law, many activities that do or may kill or injure animals are lawful, including animal husbandry practices; slaughtering livestock and poultry; animal breeding practices; fishing, hunting, and trapping; wildlife management practices; rodeos; scientific and agricultural research and teaching; control of vermin and nuisance animals; reasonable handling, training techniques. Proposed measure would make those practices, and other common practices involving animals, criminal offenses if injury/ death occurs**. Criminalizes animal breeding practices for domestic, livestock, and equine animals that involve touching the mouth, anus, or sexual organs of the animal. Exception for “good veterinary practices” (undefined), self-defense. Applies to mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish. Elimination of hunting/ fishing licenses would remove funding from wildlife conservation efforts by Department of Fish and Wildlife. Other provisions. Even rodeos. >it is a misdemeanor to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly injure an animal. Good animal husbandry practices are exempted, as are numerous practices set forth in ORS 167.335, including transportation of animals; rodeos; growing of poultry; the slaughter of animals by methods authorized by law; fishing, hunting, and trapping; lawful wildlife management; lawful scientific or agricultural research; control of vermin or pests; and reasonable handling and training techniques. **The proposed measure removes all of those exceptions**. >**If passed, IP13 would effectively shut down the state’s meat production. While Oregonians could still purchase meat imported from other states, eating home-grown animals would become a felony punishable by up to five years in prison, a $125,000 fine, or both** http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2022/013cbt.pdf Colorado: > Grass-roots activists are recruiting volunteers and starting to gather signatures for IP13 and **Colorado’s Initiative 16, both of which would redefine artificial insemination and castration of livestock as sexual assault**. Oregon’s proposal would also criminalize the slaughter of livestock, **while Colorado’s would prevent it until the animal has lived at least one-quarter of its natural lifespan**, which for cattle would be about five years. >Among the latest is American Agri-Women, whose president, Karolyn Zurn, said on April 27 **the Colorado proposal “is deceiving the voters to achieve an anti-meat agenda.**” At least Colorado’s is only anti-meat, Oregon’s also lets rodents run rampant which would cause all kinds of diseases. http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2022/013cbt.pdf https://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/2021/11/opinion-anti-hunting-ranching-initiative-would-devastate-oregons-family-farms.html https://www.farmprogress.com/livestock/national-animal-groups-shun-oregon-colorado-initiatives

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

They’re redefining “sexual assault” of an animal. If you touch its mouth, anus or sexual organs that’s sexual assault and is illegal for vets or even a pet groomer

Why do you keep leaving off the part where it says for the purpose arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of a person? That's very kike-like. That's a qualifier. That means it's not illegal unless the purpose of the act is some person's sexual gratification. You guys are defending bestiality.

It should also make you very suspicious that nobody's posting the actual text of the proposed law. Again, smells like more kikery.

Maybe I'm wrong, but it sure smells kosher.

EDIT - Now we know why they're not linking the .

(1) A person commits the crime of sexual assault of an animal if the person: (a) Touches or contacts, or causes an object or another person to touch or contact, the mouth, anus or sex organs of an animal or animal carcass for the purpose of: (A) Arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of either party; or (B) Breeding domestic, livestock, and equine animals as defined in ORS 167.310; or (b) Causes an animal or animal carcass to touch or contact the mouth, anus or sex organs of a person for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of either party. (2) Subsection (1) of this section does not apply to animals subject to good veterinary practices as described in ORS 686.030 (Acts constituting practice of veterinary medicine).

(2) is a big fucking exception. It means breeding is not outlawed it's under good veterinary care.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Because all ranchers are fucking their animals and those laws need to be strengthened and they’re opposing it. I guess you’ve never dealt with these people.

His end goal:

Host Noah Bristol (a Portland-based animal extremist) made it clear from the beginning of the program that such a change to current Oregon law would drastically change how animal agriculture does business in the state…if it could exist at all. Michelson echoed that the change in law would make Oregon a sort of “sanctuary state” for farmed animals. He notes that he is very interested to see how such a change could impact neighboring states as well.

Essentially, he was optimistic that this would make animal processing illegal in the state because it would make harvest fall under animal cruelty. This, he says, means that animals could live out there “natural lifespan” after which they could theoretically still be processed for food.

https://protecttheharvest.com/news/animal-extremists-coming-for-oregon-next-to-criminalize-animal-husbandry/

A dozen agriculture groups have lined up against the bill, Dairy Herd Management reported, noting that “IP13 would not only eliminate that exception but also slap a crime on, as it now would classify breeding livestock as sexual abuse of an animal, a Class C felony. The measure does not stop there but also would take away protections for hunting, fishing, rodeos, slaughtering livestock, wildlife management, pest control, scientific research and more.”

In an FAQ section on the website for the bill, the question is posed:

“Would IP13 make hunting, fishing, and trapping illegal? If passed, IP13 would remove the exemption for hunting, fishing, and trapping from our cruelty laws, meaning that any practice that involves the intentional injury of an animal would be criminalized. Although the practice of seeking, pursuing, and in some cases even capturing an animal would still be legally protected, the practice of killing animals would no longer be protected.”

For ranchers, it claims raising cattle would still be legal, but meat could only be harvested after the animal “died of natural causes, such as old age.”

Make Oregon a Sanctuary State for Farm Animals and Set a Precedent for Other States to Follow

Michelson more recently made an appearance on March 26th on the public radio station KBOO Portland. The program, “Voices for the Animals,” discusses animal rights issues and interviews “front-line activists.”

Because all ranchers are fucking their animals and those laws need to be strengthened and they’re opposing it. I guess you’ve never dealt with these people. His end goal: >**Host Noah Bristol (a Portland-based animal extremist) made it clear from the beginning of the program that such a change to current Oregon law would drastically change how animal agriculture does business in the state…if it could exist at all. Michelson echoed that the change in law would make Oregon a sort of “sanctuary state” for farmed animals. He notes that he is very interested to see how such a change could impact neighboring states as well**. >**Essentially, he was optimistic that this would make animal processing illegal in the state because it would make harvest fall under animal cruelty. This, he says, means that animals could live out there “natural lifespan” after which they could theoretically still be processed for food**. https://protecttheharvest.com/news/animal-extremists-coming-for-oregon-next-to-criminalize-animal-husbandry/ >A dozen agriculture groups have lined up against the bill, Dairy Herd Management reported, noting that “IP13 would not only eliminate that exception but also slap a crime on, as it now would classify breeding livestock as sexual abuse of an animal, a Class C felony. **The measure does not stop there but also would take away protections for hunting, fishing, rodeos, slaughtering livestock, wildlife management, pest control, scientific research and more**.” >In an FAQ section on the website for the bill, the question is posed: >**“Would IP13 make hunting, fishing, and trapping illegal? If passed, IP13 would remove the exemption for hunting, fishing, and trapping from our cruelty laws, meaning that any practice that involves the intentional injury of an animal would be criminalized**. Although the practice of seeking, pursuing, and in some cases even capturing an animal would still be legally protected, the practice of killing animals would no longer be protected.” >**For ranchers, it claims raising cattle would still be legal, but meat could only be harvested after the animal “died of natural causes, such as old age**.” > Make Oregon a Sanctuary State for Farm Animals and Set a Precedent for Other States to Follow >Michelson more recently made an appearance on March 26th on the public radio station KBOO Portland. The program, “Voices for the Animals,” discusses animal rights issues and interviews “front-line activists.”

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Nothing people say has anything to do with what the text of the proposed law says. It doesn't matter who supports what, or how crazy whoever is. All that matter is what the text says. You can't allow yourself to be manipulated by your feelings. That's the jew's weapon against you and all of society. It doesn't matter if the supporters are communist filth or heavenly libertarians. Focus on the actual language of the proposed law. Everything else is irrelevant.

parent
link

(post is archived)