Absolutely.
Money doesn’t solve all of your problems, especially if those problems are ticking time bombs inside of you waiting to explode.
Since you were talented enough to be considered for this job, another one will come along, especially when these jab ingredients start activating inside of their hosts.
Even though the pro-jabbers are frustratingly tedious and potentially dangerous to those of us with more common sense than fear, I hope there is an antidote in the pipeline.
Money's purpose is to solve problems. It is better to think of money in terms of problems solved, and not problems solved in terms of money. If your mode of pursuing money produces more problems you are effectively making negative money when we look at the real currency of life.
Under value equivelence theory any metric of value can be converted to another and we can think in terms of time, money, gold, energy, or risk. We can convert all value into one and think in those terms. Risk is honestly the best one to convert to. How much risk does 100k a year exstinguish. All else being equal it's quite a lot for most people. But if it introduces a serious risk, then it is negative money. If instead we found a job for $80,000, how much risk would the $20,000 on top of a 80k salary solve? There may not be enough risk left over in an 80k life that any additional money could ever make up for it.
jab ingredients
The look I get when I have conversations with garbage bloods (ibb.co)
(post is archived)