Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

226

Those states are

Indiana, Maine, New Hampshire, and New York

Ask yourself what they all have in common besides nurse and doctor shortages?

You think New York has a lack of liberal nurses?

Fuck no, so we know they aren't lacking for nurses, because there can be no doubt plenty of them got the shot.

So we know right there that the issue isn't a lack of nurses or vaccination rate.

And thats what tells you the national guard are there for some other reason.

Four states, so you know its not ahead of a false flag, unless the false flag were massive and multiregional (anthrax, fallout from a terror attack, etc).

We also know they have to pivot to war and will require a large scale disaster to do it. Both of thus, nuclear, or biological attacks, would accomplish that, and the invasion target is the one its pinned on.

Probably not though, just doomsaying here.

More likely they want to 1. normalize troops in the street, same way they normalized anything else 2. hedge against the growth and/or radicalization of the vax movement, so if anything kicks off they can claim "antivaxxers hurt/killed national guardsmen!"

In fact, if I had to guess, this is so they can false flag the national guard, and blame it/demonize the unvaccinated.

Those states are Indiana, Maine, New Hampshire, and New York Ask yourself what they all have in common besides nurse and doctor shortages? You think New York has a lack of *liberal nurses*? Fuck no, so we know they aren't lacking for nurses, because there can be no doubt plenty of them got the shot. So we know right there that the issue isn't a lack of nurses or vaccination rate. And thats what tells you the national guard are there for *some other reason*. Four states, so you know its not ahead of a false flag, unless the false flag were massive and multiregional (anthrax, fallout from a terror attack, etc). We also know they have to pivot to war and will require a large scale disaster to do it. Both of thus, nuclear, or biological attacks, would accomplish that, and the invasion target is the one its pinned on. Probably not though, just doomsaying here. More likely they want to 1. normalize troops in the street, same way they normalized anything else 2. hedge against the growth and/or radicalization of the vax movement, so if anything kicks off they can claim "antivaxxers hurt/killed national guardsmen!" In fact, if I had to guess, this is so they can false flag the national guard, and blame it/demonize the unvaccinated.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 1 pt

The 48 MUTA periods are over the calendar year. 12 months x 4 MUTA periods per one weekend per month = makes 48 pay days for 24 actual days of service per year. Then 2 weeks of Annual Training.

As far as positioning Guardsmen to fire on civilians, that shit ain't happening. It takes an act of Congress to practically authorize a Commander at a lower level to even allow Guardsmen to bring weapons out into public. So no, the 68W medic that's 19 years old and cleaning rooms in a hospital or cleaning instruments in a surgical unit to help out the short staffed hospital won't be interacting with the general public, much less anti-COVID protesters.

[–] • 0 pt

So no, the 68W medic that's 19 years old and cleaning rooms in a hospital or cleaning instruments in a surgical unit to help out the short staffed hospital won't be interacting with the general public, much less anti-COVID protesters.

I could absolutely see color-revolution tactics used by DC NGOs (antifa et al). They dress as maga, or antivax crowds, break into a hospital, and bingo, dead/injured soldiers or civilians.

This shit is trivial, but you do seem to know what you're talking about.

Explain to me why you don't see the above scenario as likely or possible. Thats what I want to know.