“political representives” Need To Be Taught Who They Represent!

Turn it around, Americans need to bribe politicians more than too big to exist corporations. We simply don't pay them as much as (((big corporations))).

link

[–] • 3 pts

They are supposed to be elected representatives, not (((elected))) nor bought. They are already paid $85/hr plus expenditures. They are well compensated for their time. More bribery is the last thing they need.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

What you say is true. You point out then, we don't actually have elected representatives, rather we have corporate proxies. Even when the people elect representatives, they become compromised and morph into corporate proxies.

We can argue whether they need more money or not. However, more money is a powerful incentive to politicians to do the bidding of their sponsor. Taxpayers don't compete well.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Turn it around, Americans need to bribe politicians more than too big to exist corporations.

Good in theory until you realize, blackmail rackets and "conspicuous murders" are likely committed by federal enforcers and NGOs to keep figureheads in line.

There is a premise that everyone in office is only allowed into office if they are compromised in some way. This is not an implausible theory with an uncontrollable federal intelligence apparatus seizing the reins in the u.s. and abroad.

Congress is essentially a hostage puppet cabinet, kabuki.

Thats why its called a "theater."

if this is true, it would look like constant "near wins" followed by a constant drumbeat of "last minute" capitulations, compromises, and backstabbing.

That describes what has been happening with the RNC/GOP et al for twenty or more years.

Ask yourself why.

In this situation bribes will do very little, because at the end they will always give in to larger bribes or blackmail.

Kinda looks like what already happens.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Sadly, I agree your scenario is more realistic. Looking back at Epstein, this is precisely what he did: compromised politicians. My question now is, who are the new Epsteins?

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

My question now is, who are the new Epsteins?

If you can't reach them, can't expose them, and the information won't be acted on by anyone in authority, then it doesn't matter. Amplify the Maxwell case because it forces the government to 1. go to war, 2. pretend to infight, 3. forces them to consider drastic options like false flags.

Think of it mechanically. Think of the party infighting or other events like proverbial C4.

Think of mid-level guys who dont understand its a one-party system, as the blasting cap.

The high level guys by themselves know the agencies like the DOJ will never go after them. The mid-level guys are the ones afraid of bad coverage and scandals.

So thats where you leverage their fear of exposure.

So thats congress critters not in committees, newly minted ones, newly minted senators, etc. And staffers and NGO middle executives.

Detonate the "blasting cap" and the whole thing goes kaboom. The parties resort to infighting, because thats among the last aces in the hole when it comes to politics. Its the last stratagem for when they want a distraction and want the public back on the us vs. them train, instead of the public vs. the potomac.

But because of the imbalance between the parties right now, combine with the need for "red meat" (political revenges) on both sides, and the need for results for both sides to feign legitimacy to the bases they pretend to represent? Because of all that, once the infighting starts it wont stop.

Basically, if you think of it in terms of accelerationism, the train is now accelerating too fast for them. And like all things accelerating too fast, at some point it will begin to "rock" on its rails, until it derails.

The parties infighting is the derailing moment.

We have the momentum.

We just need the party instability.

The base of both parties will then do the rest of spreading the infighting, getting drawn into the ideological dog fight.

We'll see defections and internationl or domestic conflict if the system reaches that stage unfortunately. Nothing we can do to prevent that.

Once the first state defection occurs (after the texas non-event fiasco previously), that will be the final crack in the dam.

The pots been stirred, and is simmering, almost to the point of a boil..

Now its time to make sure it boils over, tips, and melts down like chernobyl, and takes the rest of the federal government with it.

> My question now is, who are the new Epsteins? If you can't reach them, can't expose them, and the information won't be acted on by anyone in authority, then it doesn't matter. Amplify the Maxwell case because it forces the government to 1. go to war, 2. pretend to infight, 3. forces them to consider drastic options like false flags. Think of it mechanically. Think of the party infighting or other events like proverbial C4. Think of mid-level guys who dont understand its a one-party system, as the blasting cap. The high level guys by themselves know the agencies like the DOJ will never go after them. The mid-level guys are the ones afraid of bad coverage and scandals. So thats where you leverage their fear of exposure. So thats congress critters not in committees, newly minted ones, newly minted senators, etc. And staffers and NGO middle executives. Detonate the "blasting cap" and the whole thing goes kaboom. The parties resort to infighting, because thats among the last aces in the hole when it comes to politics. Its the last stratagem for when they want a distraction and want the public back on the us vs. them train, instead of the public vs. the potomac. But because of the imbalance between the parties right now, combine with the need for "red meat" (political revenges) on both sides, and the need for results for both sides to feign legitimacy to the bases they pretend to represent? Because of all that, once the infighting starts it wont stop. Basically, if you think of it in terms of accelerationism, the train is now accelerating too fast for them. And like all things accelerating too fast, at some point it will begin to "rock" on its rails, until it derails. The parties infighting is the derailing moment. We have the momentum. We just need the party instability. The base of both parties will then do the rest of spreading the infighting, getting drawn into the ideological dog fight. We'll see defections and internationl or domestic conflict if the system reaches that stage unfortunately. Nothing we can do to prevent *that*. Once the first state defection occurs (after the texas non-event fiasco previously), that will be the final crack in the dam. The pots been stirred, and is simmering, almost to the point of a boil.. Now its time to make sure it **boils over**, tips, and melts down like chernobyl, and takes the rest of the federal government with it.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)