WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

http://www.teamlaw.net/family.htm

Also, here is legal evidence that would be admissible in the court of law that the 2020 election was illegally stolen by the controllers of Biden-Harris: https://teamlaw.net/video/TruthRe2020Election.mp4

If you and your spouse are officially married and had children after obtaining your marriage license, then legally, your children belong to the State: http://www.teamlaw.net/family.htm

My sister-in-law lives in Utah in a very conservative community wherein most of the people place a stringent guard over the sacred union between husbands, wives, and children. Yet in that community, in 1996 my sister-in-law's natural-born son came home from school shortly after he left the house in the morning. On his way to school, he'd been beaten up by a bully and ran home. His mother called the school to inform them that her son would not be in school that day, relating the reason why. The receptionist said she'd have the principal call in about a half-hour because he was in a meeting that would last that long.

About 20 min later, there was a knock at the front door. It was the principle. He demanded she bring her son to the door or he would call the police and have her arrested and he would have her declared an unfit mother. Out of fear she got her son.

The principal said, ‘During school hours you are not his mother or guardian, the state is his parent.’ The principal then took her son back to school with him.

My sister-in-law went to the school board that day and filed paperwork requiring her son to be homeschooled.

The next day she kept her son home and about an hour after school started there was a knock at the door. It was the principal again demanding entry. This time he had a social worker and the police with him and he was intent on having her whole family removed from her as an unfit mother.

She refused their entry and showed the social worker the documents from the school board which proved that the state determined she was competent sufficient to home school her son.

Disappointed by the facts the intruders left.

In America, people with children are usually married — with a corporate state-granted marriage license. (One might ask, “If this is the land of the free, and if marriage is ordained of God, why would people need a license from the State to be married?”)

Now, everybody knows that a license is a permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal;

.

Whereas it is not otherwise illegal to be married under common or natural law; and, Whereas the only other reason it would be unlawful for two consenting adults to be married is if they were incompetent;

Therefore, if a couple goes to “the state” and asks the state for a license, where there is no other reason for them to need a license other than incompetence, in law, those requesting a license must be incompetent because that is the only reason they could need a license.

Now, one must ask, “When a bride and groom are incompetent to be married without a state license and that state grants that license, Who is responsible for the marriage?”

Answer: The state.

Who is responsible for anything created in such a licensed marriage?

Answer: The state.

And, what, typically, is the only thing created in such a marriage?

Answer: Children.

So I ask you, “Who do the children created in a state-licensed marriage belong to?”

Answer: They belong to the state.

If you don't believe it, then check out the evidence:

Evidence #1 - The state social services stand their authority on a doctrine called: “Parens Patriae” which is Latin for “parent of the country”. In modern usage parens patriae is understood to mean, “the state is the parent”.

Evidence #2 - When Corp. U.S. doctors deliver children from the mother's womb, they are required to create a legal document known as a: Record of Live Birth.

Is it given to you?

No.

You're given a: Birth Certificate.

So, what happens to the: Record of Live Birth?

It's sent to the "BUREAU OF VITAL STATISTICS",

"And what is that?" you ask?

That is a sub-department of the "DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE".

And what is the "DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE"?

It is where the Corp. U.S. keeps track of its possessions.

This evidence indicates that the state is declaring the children their possession at birth.

Evidence #3 - New statutes require the hospital to effectively assign Social Security Numbers to each child before birth, with or without the natural parent's signature or permission.

Evidence #4 - Why are each of the childbirth performing hospitals in the US registered as ports of entry when virtually none of them have incoming foreigners?

Evidence #5 - Watch the social workers and their relations with children born under marriage licenses.

It's Scary. It's proof of the war. It's fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. And if we don't do something to change things we'll have no promise from the King of Kings (other than judgment).

http://www.teamlaw.net/family.htm Also, here is legal evidence that would be admissible in the court of law that the 2020 election was illegally stolen by the controllers of Biden-Harris: https://teamlaw.net/video/TruthRe2020Election.mp4 If you and your spouse are officially married and had children after obtaining your marriage license, then legally, your children belong to the State: http://www.teamlaw.net/family.htm My sister-in-law lives in Utah in a very conservative community wherein most of the people place a stringent guard over the sacred union between husbands, wives, and children. Yet in that community, in 1996 my sister-in-law's natural-born son came home from school shortly after he left the house in the morning. On his way to school, he'd been beaten up by a bully and ran home. His mother called the school to inform them that her son would not be in school that day, relating the reason why. The receptionist said she'd have the principal call in about a half-hour because he was in a meeting that would last that long. About 20 min later, there was a knock at the front door. It was the principle. He demanded she bring her son to the door or he would call the police and have her arrested and he would have her declared an unfit mother. Out of fear she got her son. The principal said, ‘During school hours you are not his mother or guardian, the state is his parent.’ The principal then took her son back to school with him. My sister-in-law went to the school board that day and filed paperwork requiring her son to be homeschooled. The next day she kept her son home and about an hour after school started there was a knock at the door. It was the principal again demanding entry. This time he had a social worker and the police with him and he was intent on having her whole family removed from her as an unfit mother. She refused their entry and showed the social worker the documents from the school board which proved that the state determined she was competent sufficient to home school her son. Disappointed by the facts the intruders left. In America, people with children are usually married — with a corporate state-granted marriage license. (One might ask, “If this is the land of the free, and if marriage is ordained of God, why would people need a license from the State to be married?”) Now, everybody knows that a license is a permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal; . Whereas it is not otherwise illegal to be married under common or natural law; and, Whereas the only other reason it would be unlawful for two consenting adults to be married is if they were incompetent; Therefore, if a couple goes to “the state” and asks the state for a license, where there is no other reason for them to need a license other than incompetence, in law, those requesting a license must be incompetent because that is the only reason they could need a license. Now, one must ask, “When a bride and groom are incompetent to be married without a state license and that state grants that license, Who is responsible for the marriage?” Answer: The state. Who is responsible for anything created in such a licensed marriage? Answer: The state. And, what, typically, is the only thing created in such a marriage? Answer: Children. So I ask you, “Who do the children created in a state-licensed marriage belong to?” Answer: They belong to the state. If you don't believe it, then check out the evidence: Evidence #1 - The state social services stand their authority on a doctrine called: “Parens Patriae” which is Latin for “parent of the country”. In modern usage parens patriae is understood to mean, “the state is the parent”. Evidence #2 - When Corp. U.S. doctors deliver children from the mother's womb, they are required to create a legal document known as a: Record of Live Birth. Is it given to you? No. You're given a: Birth Certificate. So, what happens to the: Record of Live Birth? It's sent to the "BUREAU OF VITAL STATISTICS", "And what is that?" you ask? That is a sub-department of the "DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE". And what is the "DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE"? It is where the Corp. U.S. keeps track of its possessions. This evidence indicates that the state is declaring the children their possession at birth. Evidence #3 - New statutes require the hospital to effectively assign Social Security Numbers to each child before birth, with or without the natural parent's signature or permission. Evidence #4 - Why are each of the childbirth performing hospitals in the US registered as ports of entry when virtually none of them have incoming foreigners? Evidence #5 - Watch the social workers and their relations with children born under marriage licenses. It's Scary. It's proof of the war. It's fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. And if we don't do something to change things we'll have no promise from the King of Kings (other than judgment).

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Your kids belong to the state regardless of if you have a piece of paper or not, the only thing that matters is force.

[–] 1 pt

It's Scary. It's proof of the war. It's fulfillment of Biblical prophecy.

Its not proof of war. Its proof you are retarded and working as a federal contractor.

"AngryAryan" god damn could you not be any more on the nose with your political-police shitposting?

Anyone espousing the sovereign citizen doctrine is considered a potential terrorist, because the adoption of this line of reasoning makes you a potential terrorist or affiliated with such, seeing as sovereign citizens as a political movement are red flagged.

Have a nice day faggot.

No one buys your lawyer-speak baffle-them-with-bullshit reasoning and attempts to recruit.

What a terrible and boring joke.

It's good to see more people learning this truth. Try to ignore the idiots yelling "sovereign citizen bullshit" they don't even know sovereign citizen is a oxymoron...shows how much they know.

Guess what lemmings......everything you bought with your (their) "government" ID belongs to them. Your house, car, guns even your bank account. That all caps name is a legal fiction. It's a Corporation they made and own from your name and you use it. You ARE Dead at Sea.

Enjoying your illusion of freedom yet?

[–] 0 pt

How does one effectively correct their status?

[–] 1 pt

I thought the lexicon was somthing like The product of the marriage belongs to the state.

If so how about; yeah this marriage produced a divorce and it produced lawyer fees and it produced alimony payments.

[–] 0 pt

I believe you're right at least with the concept.

As far as I'm aware, you can actually dissolve your legal identity from the system, while the process isn't widely known or encouraged, it can be done by filing in various forms.

Same for drivers license, you don't actually need a license to drive, not for personal use which most people do. This was backed by a court ruling apparently but that won't stop the police from pulling you over and giving you a ticket, maybe even arresting you.

Same with marriage and family and this is why family courts exists. Once you get married, it's a contract between the marriage couple and the state and the contract says as far as I'm aware that the state has the ultimate authority over the assets gained during the marriage which is mainly handled during a divorce.

This is a major reason as to why I won't get married. I don't want the government involved in my life.