WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

665

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

it was based on the concept of folded paper, one fold is 2 because it is 2x the thickness its is 2x as a function not x as the function

[–] 1 pt

If you base it on paper there is never an increase and it's all just manipulation and misrepresentation.

[–] 1 pt

Sounds like yet another jew trick

[–] 0 pt

obviously i mean the added thickness of the paper after the fold. you fold it once you have 2 pieces hence twice as thick, fold it twice that would be the thickness of 4 pieces, dont bother mentioning the theoretical limits of folding paper.

[–] 0 pt

it was based on the concept of folded paper, one fold is 2 because it is 2x the thickness its is 2x as a function not x as the function

Why do you assume it refers to paper folded in half? I regularly fold paper three times without ending up with 8 sheets' thickness. That's the standard letter fold.