> that's fair enough, I'm just speculating too. No, don't equivocate. You're right about kyle here. Hes naive. Hes been naive throughout all of this. If there was a shred of marxism in him I think we would have seen it come out at trial. Or in opposition research. If there was a shred of whitenat in him, same thing. This is either just a young man saying what his lawyers tell him to, or expressing *generic* support for peoples right to demonstrate/speak/assemble. Because he clearly doesn't support riots or rioting. Even though BLM and antifa do.