Someone at church told me i was destructively generous. the reason for it is two fold, or really two examples
i gave away around 2500 bullets to a bunch of church members. i didn't particularly feel bad about it, i just have a life philosophy that everyone should be armed and have bullets for their guns. i didn't ask for money back or payment for said bullets, i just don't see ammo and guns as an item that has to be restricted, especially in these trying times.
my old tenants were looking to buy the house i owned. it had an appraisal price of around 550,000, and i had originally bought it for around 450,000, and i'm selling it at around 415,000. so i technically lost money on the sale, when you account for how much i paid for it. however, there is more insidiousness to the madness. part of me has a hypothesis that by intentionally under bidding my house to someone, it will force the appraisals of the local area down, and eventually cause a housing pop, so to speak.
in both cases my reasoning is very calculated, i guess people are just not used to see someone who doesn't just take the cash and run anymore
Someone at church told me i was destructively generous. the reason for it is two fold, or really two examples
i gave away around 2500 bullets to a bunch of church members. i didn't particularly feel bad about it, i just have a life philosophy that everyone should be armed and have bullets for their guns. i didn't ask for money back or payment for said bullets, i just don't see ammo and guns as an item that has to be restricted, especially in these trying times.
my old tenants were looking to buy the house i owned. it had an appraisal price of around 550,000, and i had originally bought it for around 450,000, and i'm selling it at around 415,000. so i technically lost money on the sale, when you account for how much i paid for it. however, there is more insidiousness to the madness. part of me has a hypothesis that by intentionally under bidding my house to someone, it will force the appraisals of the local area down, and eventually cause a housing pop, so to speak.
in both cases my reasoning is very calculated, i guess people are just not used to see someone who doesn't just take the cash and run anymore
(post is archived)