WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

There is no proof of the "for the better" at all. It is trivial to make the case for the opposite.

People talk about neutropics as being beneficial in the same way a mouse infected with toxoplasmosis has it's brain re-wired to like the smell of cat urine so that it gets eaten so the toxo plasmosis parasite can complete it's lifecyle.

I have NEVER seen a single user of psychadelics / neutropics not exhibit the behaviour of a host being controlled by a parasitic relationship. The only difference between toxoplasmosis is that we consider that parasite alive and we don't consider the psychadelic compounds and substances as alive.

But, the relationship pattern between the substance and the host and the relationship pattern of each type of host is identical.

That is just the perspective from the point of view of medical analysis.

If you were to analyze the relationship between the host and the parasitic compound from a military and political perspective, then you can CLEARLY see in 100% of users that those parasitic substances LOWER THE HOSTS OFFENSIVE AND DEFENSIVE SKILLSTACKS. These parasitic substances literally re-wire your brain in a way that lowers your connection to your own species of human by re-wiring your brains nerual pathwas that express in-group preferenc in favour of out-group preferences essentially making the host something closer to cattle than what they should be: a highly aggressive and genocidal primate.

I am aware of the use of psychadelics as medications for addictions. But, when we frame them as medications for addiction I think we miss their true nature and put our children at risk. What we are really doing is using one set of parasitic substances (psychadelics) to counter the re-wiring done by another group of parasitic substances (alcohol, cocaine, etc.). Once your brain is re-wired by one set of perasitic substances like alcohol, re-wiring your brain with another set of parasitic substances like psychadelics doesn't necessarily fix the problem. All we have done is convert a helthy human -> one type of unhealthy human -> another unhealthy type of human.

We need to explore better ways of treating addictions. Calhouns Rodent Utopia experiments suggest that controlling for envionmental factors could have tremendous effects on human addictive behaviour. And, if you were to visualize a new set of religious beliefs and religious instituation for our people that can marry our white species need for individualism + need for collectivism and direct it toward our species survival strategy, we might be able to automaticaly help our people get rid of addictive types of behaviour. That would be just one mechanism, it is easy to imagine many other types as well that take the Calhouns experimental observations and build on top of that.

Anyway, largely, I look at the Joe Rogan and other types of druggies as permanently damaged individuals whose brains have been so obviously re-wired by parasitic substances that I couldn't ever imagine suggesting anyone else do that to them selves.

[–] 0 pt

This is all very interesting for sure. There is also no proof against it, simply my anecdote and your opinion.

[–] 0 pt

Oh! You are correct. I have no proof for my conjecture, for sure.

Thanks for the clarification.