Honestly, until risk vs reward becomes standard public policy discussion with votes, only a moron wouldn't be anti-vax. Turns out most vaxs have never worked. Many (all?) are harmful. I'm not aware of any which have actually proved highly effective. But openly admit there may be some. But we don't know because policy discussion based on data isn't allowed. The simple fact no policy discussion on the basis of science, risk, and reward, is allowed speaks louder than anything else. They clearly fear honest public discussions and an educated vaccine public and corresponding policy. What is so hard to understand about that?