WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

823

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese.

2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in.

3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese. 2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in. 3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Why did the Christians tolerate the presence of the jews in the first place?

Jews were useful, of course. What other answer could there be. They were tolerated because of their usefulness, but loathed because their values were in conflict with Christian values. When their harm outdid their usefulness, they were thrown out of the country.