Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

238

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese.

2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in.

3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese. 2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in. 3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (25).
[–] • 0 pt

That post was

race realist acknowledged the jewish problem supported white nationalism merely talked about how not all blacks or jews are worthy of hatred, and that it's what members of these races do that we hate them for, not what they look like or what their ethnicity they come from.

[–] • 0 pt

Coal-burning/oil-drilling and race realism aren’t mutually exclusive.

[–] • 0 pt

But white nationalism and racemixing are, by definition. I never said anything in support of racemixing. I oppose it, in fact.

[–] • 0 pt

So you don’t like coal burners?