Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese.

2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in.

3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese. 2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in. 3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (25).
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia

A jewish actor murdered the president to stop that.

[–] • 1 pt

His replacement should have finished what he had started, a better route would have been to let the south secede in the first place. Lincoln was a traitor whose death occurred when he himself got betrayed.

[–] • 0 pt

They were Jesuits... But if you're going to do the "everything is Jewish" but, then I guess, according to your (likely) fantasy, maybe they were "Jews".