Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

742

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese.

2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in.

3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

1 is letting in the jews and tolerating their schemes like bringing in africans and mexicans and chinese. 2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia, I have little clue why that plan was avoided, also, they should have sent all the jews to isreal the momment it was founded, then took measures to ensure not a single jew would get back in. 3 is seeking to preserve the union at all costs, rather than allowing parts of the country to secede, if they let the south leave instead of starting the civil war, or if they allowed the blacks to leave instead of instituting integration, a lot of issues could have been avoided.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

2 is not sending all the blacks away to Liberia

A jewish actor murdered the president to stop that.

[–] • 1 pt

His replacement should have finished what he had started, a better route would have been to let the south secede in the first place. Lincoln was a traitor whose death occurred when he himself got betrayed.

[–] • 0 pt

They were Jesuits... But if you're going to do the "everything is Jewish" but, then I guess, according to your (likely) fantasy, maybe they were "Jews".

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

One your three points:

Point One: For centuries the Jews were kept at armslength in Christian nations. When they became too troublesome they were expelled, but as long as they kept to their place -- that of an alien tribe living in a foreign land on the sufferance of its people -- they were tolerated. What happened to change that was the decay of Christianity -- the loss of Christian faith and Christian principles. This the Jews encouraged, of course, but they could never have managed it on their own. They only enlarged a weakness that had already developed in Christian nations. As Christians lost their faith, it was easy for the Jews to take over the media, and to bombard the people with anti-Christian, anti-white propaganda. What I'm saying is Jews are the problem, but only because we lost our faith.

Point Two: It was a great tragedy that black slaves were imported into the US to work the plantations in the South. Anyone with foresight could have told the people then living that the blacks would never fit into American culture. But of course, those who bought the slaves never imagined a time when the blacks would be allowed to associate with whites freely. It never even crossed their minds, it was so crazy. There was one chance to right the problem. That was after the end of the Civil War, when Lincoln contemplated sending the blacks back to Africa. That would have been a reasonable and just thing to do, and it would have removed the nigger problem from America. Tragically, Lincoln never got to carry out this plan, and niggers have lived on hand-outs from whites ever since, and have been used as a weapon against whites by the Jews.

Point Three: If the South had been permitted to secede, that would have been the end of the Union, and the "fall of the USA," as you put it in your title. I do agree, however, that the South should have been permitted to withdraw from the Union. It had freely entered, and it should have been permitted to freely leave. Subjugating half the population just to preserve a political union that had only existed for a short time anyway was a tragedy.

[–] • 2 pts

Why did the Christians tolerate the presence of the jews in the first place?

Lincoln was a traitor to his people, he was a liar who deceived them into accepting the liberation of a foreign race in their lands, just so that he could prevent white Americans from exercizing the right to Secession guaranteed to them under the founding documents of their country, yes, if the south left, so would other states, but the USA was far too large to begin with, with all these different environments the cultural and political divides would cause so much conflict within the union that it would be better if a string of Secessions carved it up into smaller countries.

Otherwise, complete agreement from me to everything you said.

[–] • 1 pt

Why did the Christians tolerate the presence of the jews in the first place?

Jews were useful, of course. What other answer could there be. They were tolerated because of their usefulness, but loathed because their values were in conflict with Christian values. When their harm outdid their usefulness, they were thrown out of the country.

[–] • 1 pt

lol That's kinda funny coming from a nigger apologist. Oy Vey, rabbi! Whatcha doin!

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Is silent_majority a nigger apologist or do you mean me?

I do apologize that my race didn't take care of the nigger problem when they should have.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not apologizing for blacks. Quite the opposite, I'm talking about how not taking the chances to get rid of them was a mistake, and because of it, Americans had been suffering for a long time.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

That post was

race realist acknowledged the jewish problem supported white nationalism merely talked about how not all blacks or jews are worthy of hatred, and that it's what members of these races do that we hate them for, not what they look like or what their ethnicity they come from.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

What's glowing about my post?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

You nigger. Who slightly changes your username after your alts get fucked by points or banned.

[–] • 0 pt

Why? Care to explain what you have to criticize me for?

[–] • 0 pt

I have never had an a count banned or had points run into the negative, I've had three accounts on here, one was doing well, but I closed it, the second one I had for a short time until I forgot the password, this is the third I've made.