Of European stock.
You mean like portuguese and albanians? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Europe#European_ethnic_groups_by_sovereign_state
I mean like it's confusing as fuck when it's gotten into like this. The lower like 70% of Italy is full of sandjew rape-baby lineage. So it's quite difficult. I understand the question. But it's just insanely hard to answer when more than just "well White people are!!!" is expected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Anglo-Saxon_Protestants#Post%E2%80%93World_War_II
White Anglo Saxon Protestant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons
>The Anglo-Saxons were a cultural group who inhabited England in the Early Middle Ages. They traced their origins to the 5th century settlement of incomers to Britain, who migrated to the island from the North Sea coastlands of mainland Europe. However, the ethnogenesis of the Anglo-Saxons occurred within Britain, and the identity was not merely directly imported. The development of an Anglo-Saxon identity arose from the interaction between incoming groups of people from a number of Germanic tribes, both amongst themselves, and with indigenous British groups. Many of the natives, over time, adopted Anglo-Saxon culture and language and were assimilated. The Anglo-Saxons established the concept, and the Kingdom, of England, and though the modern English language owes somewhat less than 26% of its words to their language, this includes the vast majority of words used in everyday speech.[1]
They weren't looking for any random type of european stock, but this one in particular
https://www.publicmedievalist.com/race-in-the-trenches/
>In my research, I explore how archaeologists since the 1980s have approached the study of ethnic identity in the material record. I focus on Britain from the late fourth to the mid-sixth centuries, during what people call the “adventus saxonum”—the migration of the Anglo-Saxons to Britain after effective collapse of Roman rule.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wasp
an American of Northern European and especially British ancestry and of Protestant background especially : a member of the dominant and the most privileged class of people in the U.S. < lol, the woke mob strikes again
...
So, they weren't just looking for "genetics"/biological markers
Biological marker (native of northern europe, england, british ancestry), cultural marker (anglo-saxon), and religious marker (not anglican, not catholic, but protestant, specifically)...
3 markers to narrow down a specific ethnic group, that's what they ended up using
And I'm not saying "we" should do just that the exact same way, since it would alienate a huge chunk of whites; catholics, orthodoxes, atheists for instance or cultural christian (non baptised but not necessarily "faithless"), and non english speakers (icelanders for instance, you can hardly be more white than that https://pic8.co/sh/ddoBL6.jpeg )
"Whites" in the large sense of the term, the descendants of native european tribes, are all targeted by the (((antiwhite))) agenda, and there are non whites, like the admins here, who are totally opposed to the antiwhite agenda
So you see, while "race" matters (I use quotes because "ethnicity" is more scientifically sound, jews aren't a race for instance even if some like to fancy themselves as such), it's not necessarily the ideal rallying vector, to say the least
(post is archived)