![This. This right here is the "white" girl all of you destroyed, demoralized, and jew-controlled cucks see with niggers. This right here. [1170x1902 - 1.06MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/ohyYiC.jpg){kind=link}
White Anglo Saxon Protestant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons
That's specifically "WASP" as it's known. That is an ethnicity within "Whites". Not all Whites are Aryan, all Aryans are White.
The issue I have the studies/research like that is it necessarily asserts that Britain and the region wasn't already a White land. That Whites aren't natively from the area. That Whites "spawned" elsewhere and moved there. Which is so far from the truth I just ignore them.
It's like the claim;
Aryans are from Iran and South East Asia!!!
Nothing further from the truth has even been written or uttered. That's wrong. The linguistic origins of the word "Aryan" are from the region, sure. But the Aryan peoples are not. Nor are any White peoples.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wasp an American of Northern European and especially British ancestry and of Protestant background especially : a member of the dominant and the most privileged class of people in the U.S. < lol, the woke mob strikes again
Yes. I'm like 20% WASP and 75% German - blue eyes though little blonde hair remains, mostly sandy brown.
So you see, while "race" matters (I use quotes because "ethnicity" is more scientifically sound, jews aren't a race for instance even if some like to fancy themselves as such), it's not necessarily the ideal rallying vector, to say the least
Yes it does and I agree. You can see as you explained in your own post how difficult it is because "What are Whites?" needs a bit of qualification. Because if I were to say Whites are white people I would gain a good number of jews, a good number of spics, a good number of Middle-Easterners etc. I couldn't say "English speakers" either for obvious reasons.
jews aren't a race for instance even if some like to fancy themselves as such), it's not necessarily the ideal rallying vector, to say the least
I disagree.
I can't find the one that charts the significantly high rate of EVERY mental illness that jews carry by way of genetic material. These things dictate a race, these things exclude ethnicity. That isn't to say there isn't also a jewish "ethnicity" (culture of child rape, blood libel, animal fucking, "miscegenation" etc). But they do very much show the race of jews exists. Also, to claim "jew" isn't a race means you believe "jew" is learned. Which can then be furhter used to absolve jews of their sins which in effect gives them the ability to further play the victim.
But then black jews/falasha? I mean, you can hardly take an ashkenazi, a sepharadi, and a falasha, and tell me with a straight face that it's the same race lol
Ashkenazim carry a collection of genetic defects due to their obsession with jewish purity. While it's definitely a valid marker to identify a specific ethnic group, within a larger ethnic group called "jews", I don't think that's enough to label "jews" as a race.
It's ashkenazim that we're mostly dealing with in the west I believe, the shapeshifters parading as anglos
Sepharadim generally look more like arabs or turks, it's harder to shapeshift (and ashkenazim consider them as lesser jews) https://search.brave.com/images?q=sepharadim%20jews
Edit https://pic8.co/sh/KysPTC.jpeg
It's "mizrahi" jews who look like total arabs it seems https://search.brave.com/images?q=mezrahi%20jews
you can hardly take an ashkenazi, a sepharadi, and a falasha, and tell me with a straight face that it's the same race lol
I 100% absolutely can and will. Ever see a pitch black streetshitter Indian? I have. Ever see a pale white streetshitter Indian? I have. Ever see a yellow streetshitter Indian? I have. Ever see a brown streetshitter Indian? I have.
Ashkenazi kikes carry a collection of
drivel
Stolen DNA. They're gene thieves. They're still kikes.
Sepharadim generally look more like arabs or turks,
LITERALLY the SAME thing as muh Ashkenazi. That being: a kike. The two things you're doing is arguing for the benefits of jews. And arguing the point that race doesn't exist it's species that does.
The former really bugs me to see from you. Like a lot. jews at base stole White DNA and that's what muh ahskenazi jews are. Still jews. jews that didn't steal White DNA are sepharadi jews. Still jews. Still the same stock.
Further; Using this same argument is then arguing that a "White" isn't a race because a (true) Roman from Ancient Rome and a Swede from the same aren't precisely the same. That's wrong, preposterous, and a primary goal of kikes' is to destroy (deconstruct) "Whiteness", which is quite literally what you are doing right this moment and it's giving me pause.
What you're also doing is applying guilt to only "ashkenazi" jews and absolving other jews. Which lends toward "not all jews". jew is a race. If either your mother or father ... are racially jews then you are too.
So you're putting in the same race, ethiopians and eastern europeans?
You can call it an ethnic group yeah, but a race... It's like failing to make the distinction between a polar bear and a sloth bear.
Ok it's a bear. Same race? Not exactly...
(post is archived)