WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

This 40.9% 0% White girl.

This ~~40.9%~~ 0% White girl.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I mean like it's confusing as fuck when it's gotten into like this. The lower like 70% of Italy is full of sandjew rape-baby lineage. So it's quite difficult. I understand the question. But it's just insanely hard to answer when more than just "well White people are!!!" is expected.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Anglo-Saxon_Protestants#Post%E2%80%93World_War_II

White Anglo Saxon Protestant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons

>The Anglo-Saxons were a cultural group who inhabited England in the Early Middle Ages. They traced their origins to the 5th century settlement of incomers to Britain, who migrated to the island from the North Sea coastlands of mainland Europe. However, the ethnogenesis of the Anglo-Saxons occurred within Britain, and the identity was not merely directly imported. The development of an Anglo-Saxon identity arose from the interaction between incoming groups of people from a number of Germanic tribes, both amongst themselves, and with indigenous British groups. Many of the natives, over time, adopted Anglo-Saxon culture and language and were assimilated. The Anglo-Saxons established the concept, and the Kingdom, of England, and though the modern English language owes somewhat less than 26% of its words to their language, this includes the vast majority of words used in everyday speech.[1]

They weren't looking for any random type of european stock, but this one in particular

https://www.publicmedievalist.com/race-in-the-trenches/

>In my research, I explore how archaeologists since the 1980s have approached the study of ethnic identity in the material record. I focus on Britain from the late fourth to the mid-sixth centuries, during what people call the “adventus saxonum”—the migration of the Anglo-Saxons to Britain after effective collapse of Roman rule.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wasp

an American of Northern European and especially British ancestry and of Protestant background especially : a member of the dominant and the most privileged class of people in the U.S. < lol, the woke mob strikes again

...

So, they weren't just looking for "genetics"/biological markers

Biological marker (native of northern europe, england, british ancestry), cultural marker (anglo-saxon), and religious marker (not anglican, not catholic, but protestant, specifically)...

3 markers to narrow down a specific ethnic group, that's what they ended up using

And I'm not saying "we" should do just that the exact same way, since it would alienate a huge chunk of whites; catholics, orthodoxes, atheists for instance or cultural christian (non baptised but not necessarily "faithless"), and non english speakers (icelanders for instance, you can hardly be more white than that https://pic8.co/sh/ddoBL6.jpeg )

"Whites" in the large sense of the term, the descendants of native european tribes, are all targeted by the (((antiwhite))) agenda, and there are non whites, like the admins here, who are totally opposed to the antiwhite agenda

So you see, while "race" matters (I use quotes because "ethnicity" is more scientifically sound, jews aren't a race for instance even if some like to fancy themselves as such), it's not necessarily the ideal rallying vector, to say the least

[–] 1 pt

White Anglo Saxon Protestant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons

That's specifically "WASP" as it's known. That is an ethnicity within "Whites". Not all Whites are Aryan, all Aryans are White.

https://www.publicmedievalist.com/race-in-the-trenches/

The issue I have the studies/research like that is it necessarily asserts that Britain and the region wasn't already a White land. That Whites aren't natively from the area. That Whites "spawned" elsewhere and moved there. Which is so far from the truth I just ignore them.

It's like the claim;

Aryans are from Iran and South East Asia!!!

Nothing further from the truth has even been written or uttered. That's wrong. The linguistic origins of the word "Aryan" are from the region, sure. But the Aryan peoples are not. Nor are any White peoples.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wasp an American of Northern European and especially British ancestry and of Protestant background especially : a member of the dominant and the most privileged class of people in the U.S. < lol, the woke mob strikes again

Yes. I'm like 20% WASP and 75% German - blue eyes though little blonde hair remains, mostly sandy brown.

So you see, while "race" matters (I use quotes because "ethnicity" is more scientifically sound, jews aren't a race for instance even if some like to fancy themselves as such), it's not necessarily the ideal rallying vector, to say the least

Yes it does and I agree. You can see as you explained in your own post how difficult it is because "What are Whites?" needs a bit of qualification. Because if I were to say Whites are white people I would gain a good number of jews, a good number of spics, a good number of Middle-Easterners etc. I couldn't say "English speakers" either for obvious reasons.

jews aren't a race for instance even if some like to fancy themselves as such), it's not necessarily the ideal rallying vector, to say the least

I disagree.

I can't find the one that charts the significantly high rate of EVERY mental illness that jews carry by way of genetic material. These things dictate a race, these things exclude ethnicity. That isn't to say there isn't also a jewish "ethnicity" (culture of child rape, blood libel, animal fucking, "miscegenation" etc). But they do very much show the race of jews exists. Also, to claim "jew" isn't a race means you believe "jew" is learned. Which can then be furhter used to absolve jews of their sins which in effect gives them the ability to further play the victim.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

But then black jews/falasha? I mean, you can hardly take an ashkenazi, a sepharadi, and a falasha, and tell me with a straight face that it's the same race lol

Ashkenazim carry a collection of genetic defects due to their obsession with jewish purity. While it's definitely a valid marker to identify a specific ethnic group, within a larger ethnic group called "jews", I don't think that's enough to label "jews" as a race.

It's ashkenazim that we're mostly dealing with in the west I believe, the shapeshifters parading as anglos

Sepharadim generally look more like arabs or turks, it's harder to shapeshift (and ashkenazim consider them as lesser jews) https://search.brave.com/images?q=sepharadim%20jews

Edit https://pic8.co/sh/KysPTC.jpeg

It's "mizrahi" jews who look like total arabs it seems https://search.brave.com/images?q=mezrahi%20jews