Whites colonized South Africa without a issue from the negroes there, as the Whites did throughout Africa itself. They (the negroes) got angry, lustful, and jealous over what the Whites created wanting it all for their own. They can't because the lack of skill set won't automatically kick in if you just take over. I think that's their mindset.
The Boers built South Africa from empty land.
They didn't colonize anything. The Bantu tribes came down from the north and positioned themselves near South Africa because of the money. It was always the Boer settlers country. The blacks had nothing to do with it. It wasn't one country with apartheid. It was two separate countries.
The Boers never should have ever let the Bantu tribes near their nation. They gave them work and a home far better than the life they left and suddenly in the 1980's the world tells (forces through international sanctions) the people who made the nation that they must surrender it to migrant workers who didn't create it.
Europe and the UK "colonized" throughout Africa without much push back centuries ago.
India was colonized.
South Africa was harsh empty land unwanted and unoccupied by others and was settled.
It was precisely because South Africa wasn't part of the English colonization and hence was not subject to the same Jewish control in the 1980's that the Jewish controlled nations of The UK and the USA turned on South Africa and broke it with sanctions.
crab mentality
(post is archived)