WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

First season was a lot of fun but when they introduced the slow moving hit men I got worried they didn't have a plan and when they killed the hit men off in that retarded way in the parking lot I noped out.

Cranston gives a first rate performance in it but most of the other actors were pretty poor. Meth Damon turned in a good performance but the guy playing Pinkman was shite and Skyler actress was unwatchable, the Hank and Marie stuff was straight up boring crap. A few good actors and a hacky script don't make a great show for me. I watched the finale with some mates and I thought it was a decent wrap up.

Mad Men was a much better show. Weeds was a better show if we are talking middle class drug dealers responding to tragedy, at least it was funny and not jammed up its own twat with self importance.

So many weak performances in BB and it seemed to be trying to be believable while having next to no relation to reality, it was a dumb show made for bug men to give them a vicarious thrill

[–] 0 pt

Weeds hahaha gtfo It was like a course in (propaganda), every fucking episode.

S4 was literally just episode after episode of masturbatory fantasy fodder for white wealthy bubble women.

[–] 0 pt

Well if I had to sit and watch an episode of either BB or weeds i would pick weeds. It actually entertained me rather than being boring or pretentious or just generally full of unlike-able cunts. Well, both shows were full of unlike-able cunts but one lot I could laugh at and the other lot irritated me.

I can't pick out seasons like you can, i didn't pay that much attention, but I definitely remember being amused for most of weeds, even as they dragged it out longer than they should have. BB tried to play like it was a serious drama but had some of the most ridiculous horse shit piled on.