Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

759

Getting letters? Threats? What about "We're coming to your home to remove your goods to satisfy the debt".

Quite simply this: 1. Phone up the bailiff 2. Yes of course I will pay 3. Please kindly provide proof of claim.

You must agree to pay upon condition of PROOF OF CLAIM.

4, 5, 6 ... The bailiff cannot arrange a court hearing if you do not "dispute the claim". This is the essence of the Common Law and Contract Law. Courts are there to SETTLE DISPUTES.

If you do not dispute the claim, but merely ask for proof of their claim, then you will neutralise bailiffs.

Courts to not enforce debts. They SETTLE DISPUTES.

"Yes, Mr Bailiff, of course I will pay. Just prove that I owe the money and I will pay at once".

Works every time. Know the fucking law, Poal. AMA I deal with bailiffs on the regular.

Getting letters? Threats? What about "We're coming to your home to remove your goods to satisfy the debt". Quite simply this: 1. Phone up the bailiff 2. Yes of course I will pay 3. Please kindly provide proof of claim. You must agree to pay upon condition of PROOF OF CLAIM. 4, 5, 6 ... The bailiff cannot arrange a court hearing if you do not "dispute the claim". This is the essence of the Common Law and Contract Law. Courts are there to SETTLE DISPUTES. If you do not dispute the claim, but merely ask for proof of their claim, then you will neutralise bailiffs. Courts to not enforce debts. They SETTLE DISPUTES. "Yes, Mr Bailiff, of course I will pay. Just prove that I owe the money and I will pay at once". Works every time. Know the fucking law, Poal. AMA I deal with bailiffs on the regular.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Perhaps you will care to join me at my next court case, 9 August. Once more, I will successfully repudiate a tax claim on the grounds that said claim falls under Maritime Law not Common Law. I always win these cases and no, I am not an attorney. I am a well-informed Englishman.

THAMES MAGISTRATES COURT LONDON 9TH AUGUST

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Not either. Your court case is easy. Petition the whale to be your life partner, prove your homelessness and your mental unfitness (as evidenced from your online banter), and you can live free in public housing with any wildlife you chose. God dam this is great… keep responding little man. Next you will say you are oppressed by other minorities. Yes we know you are black/brown/red. No matter. Fuck off. AHHHH…. THAMES MAGISTRATES That’s like saying Supreme Court Fuck Yeah… no one will you fucktoy.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

That's not a bad defence strategy actually. Thanks for the heads-up. You jews are marvellous at coming up with tricks to avoid justice. No wonder it's called the JEWdiciary haha

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

No I am shutting you down for being fake. You can’t prove you are real after you give supposed legal advice. Stop being a fake ass shill. Be real…. Or prove it bitch boy…… Or is it, “I’m just an English boy and don’t properly know the codes but feel like I can tell you about them.” Fuck straight off tosser. “ I say maritime because I think you guys don’t practice it.” Guess what fag, we do. So stop giving out fake advice, idiot.