Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Think about it, a racist has such strong morality that they're willing to shun their schooling (brainwashing) and modern society because of it.

When a racist sees chimps nigging out, chinks being dishonest immoral bug people, indians being generally disgusting, and the jews pushing degeneracy everywhere.. They're the ones that take a stand against it and are willing to perform "thought crime" to denounce it. Racists have such high integrity that they won't let anything corrupt their morality.

Thus racists are the good guys, thoughts?

Think about it, a racist has such strong morality that they're willing to shun their schooling (brainwashing) and modern society because of it. When a racist sees chimps nigging out, chinks being dishonest immoral bug people, indians being generally disgusting, and the jews pushing degeneracy everywhere.. They're the ones that take a stand against it and are willing to perform "thought crime" to denounce it. Racists have such high integrity that they won't let anything corrupt their morality. Thus racists are the good guys, thoughts?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (129).
[–] • 3 pts

You can be "racist" (I wouldn't use that word personally though - I'd use the word "discerning") for the right reasons. Irrational spergery (which is nothing more than clowns wanting nothing more than personal gain off others through a pack of lies) isn't the right reason for it.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I wouldn't use that word personally though

Same here

That word, is a weapon of mass subversion, to the point that, we can't even use it in a conversation without agreeing on a common definition first, these days. And when it comes to definitions of that word, that's where we enter crazyshit territory

There's a root concept, in that word, that is morally sound, that's why it works in the first place. But there's also much more attached to it, concepts that are lumped with it, and it's on purpose, since "day1" when soviet decided to use it as a political weapon

Anti-immigration political stances being among those embedded concepts. That's racism, that's racist (not according to me, to be clear), as in "You're against the browns by being anti immigration, therefore you're racist, therefore you lose, because you're immoral, therefore a scum, a criminal, child murder and shit"

...

That word is a catch22 type of stuff, you're caught between the hammer and the anvil, on purpose. Either you are not "racist" and then you accept the brown invasion, or you're racist and morally wrong, with the baddies, a piece of shit, a child murderer, you lose

[–] • 1 pt

That word, is a weapon of mass subversion, to the point that, we can't even use it in a conversation without agreeing on a common definition first, these days.

It's precisely why I don't let them dictate the terms of the debate. When you let them do so, you have already lost due to their spergery.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I don't accept to be labelled as a "racist" just because I entirely oppose immigration, illegal and otherwise.

It's too easy.

I don't accept to live in a violent "society" divided along ethnic and/or ethno-religious lines, plagued by ethnic tensions, factions and ultimately ravaged by a civil war similar to what happened in kosovo

And that's what immigration, let alone mass immigration, without assimilation, inevitably brings on the table.