WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Start reading majority and minority opinions. This ruling ONLY gave the girl $1 but eviscerated Tinker.

Start reading majority and minority opinions. This ruling ONLY gave the girl $1 but eviscerated Tinker.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Summary?

[–] 1 pt

So Tinker V ... in 1969 established that even within the school, the school had zero authority over speech that was legal. Meaning: true threats the school could "infringe" on etc.

This has been eroded away in quite a few jewtus decisions since then. This decision further erodes it by expanding schools' ability to silence speech to include the internet and private communications. Which is odd, there's something called the Heckler principle in which a 3rd party can't be seen as having any interest at all in private communications of others. Regardless how broad those communications are. This is who the mother who was shown a screenshot of the snap is: the heckler. Heckler's vetoes are not legally permissible and should be disregarded with prejudice. That didn't happen here.

Further; The ruling wasn't a 1st amendment ruling. It was a ruling on compensatory damages. ALL OF ONE FUCKING DOLLAR. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SUCH A BIG FUCKING WIN.

The quote in the title says it all. The totally baste nigger's single minority dissent isn't good either.