- The largest failing of our people is our lack of theory of mind for the majority of those who are opposed to us, most of whom are normies who take everything at face value, what they see at first glance is usually enough for them to form lasting opinions, and they have been indoctrinated to see things a certain way and to react to trigger stimulus with conditioned responses. - Most of them don't often care to think of things that go beyond entertainment or work. But when they do encounter subjects of greater importance, they feel confident that they know what is obviously false or evil and to be rejected without consideration, with that the source is dismissed as stupid or crazy. Once they have identified you as a poisonous well, they shall close themselves off to you forever, they are a "lost customer" in Bernay's terms. - We must make black and jewish people less scared of us, by making it clear that our concern is only with the threats to our people, in their existence, political representation, quality of life, etc. and that we are not concerned with being a threat to any member of the jewish of black race that does not wish ill will upon our people or is acting as an accomplice to those who do. - A lot of the opinions the average black or jew NPC holds about us and our message, is coming from the belief that we are a threat to them, think carefully about the messages you are sending to these sorts of readers and how your messages are being received. - This applies to white people as well, as they also will produce the same reaction if we come across as someone who has a hatred for entire groups of people without consideration for the distribution of qualities within those groups that could serve to justify such sentiments. - Would you hate a black or jewish guy who is not anti-white (or an accomplice to others who are)? or one who is pro-white (or an accomplice to others who are)? If a white guy's brain was somehow given control over a black man's body, or vice versa, what would your attitudes be to each of these people? We don't hate them for their skin color, we hate the activity they engage in due to the hatred they have for our skin color. - We need to be clear that it is not their membership to the group that we are judging them by, but instead by these other traits that threaten our people, its anti-white hatred that is the thing that we hate, not any people or grouping of people, so we should make the point clear "I hate anyone who hates or threatens my people". - We also need to make it clear that we are willing to forgive and overlook those who renounce their former anti-white ways, or at least those who cut that shit out, even if only out of pure self-preservation in a "pascal's wager" type reasoning, it's going to cut down on our enemies, and going to build up some allies. - We need to watch our language from now on, we've been psy-op'd into damaging our ability to draw sympathy from others, a lot of our language has been shaped by fear of rejection by our peers and a need for approval from them, needlessly extreme statements have been conditioned into us as the standard of earning trust within this community, because of this, we tend to engage in hyperbolic language that has only served to undermine our cause, and given the enemy ammo to use against us, This edgelord shit is turning potential allies away and creating more enemies for us. - Before you mention similar statements on the other side directed towards out people, you must keep in mind that this is not a symmetrical war, the enemy may use even literally-intended language that resembles out hyperbolic speech and get away with it, they have the hold of cultural capital, and that gives them the ability to get away with a lot of things that we simply cannot, furthermore, by responding in kind, you make such statements understandable and sympathetic. - We need to be realistic and specific and not overstate things nor understate them, but instead present things with very careful and deliberate attention to being accurate, even down to the most miniscule details, stop making broad and sweeping generalizations, and instead learn the specific details and use those, make you claims very precise, and be open about what room you give to your statements for potential error. instead of saying "balls are green, squares are red" or saying "most balls are green and most squares are red", you should be saying "x number of balls are green, y number of balls are red, and by comparison, x number of squares are green, and x number of squares are red". - We need to stop just throwing facts at people without any accompaniment, and instead we must always present them with the reason we are presenting the facts that we are, they must all come back to the defense of our people. "Why do we talk about racial population's differences in intelligence and personality traits?", "because they are being used to counter the claim that the explanation for difference in racial performances is due to a conspiracy of systematic oppression perpetrated by our people against others". - This is an important step because a lot of people will be inserting the reasons behind our information, and use that as a means to close themselves off to us, when this occurs, we lose people by presenting facts to them. So we must preemptively close off that hole before they can fill it in with their own fears about us (that our current approach doesn't do much to dissuade). - We need to start talking about historic acts of racial oppression committed by other races, we need to start filling in the blanks that were intentionally inserted into our history education, we need to make it so that people can see the "great white crimes" as being just us doing the exact same thing everyone else was doing, and in most cases, the other races were worse than us. - We need to make it so that people see us as just being people, not as some special group of people. Because the mainstream view of history makes it appear as if our race is a special kind of evil, we are just morally inferior to everyone else, and this is passively being accepted by even our own kind. We need to give people a more accurate picture of history, and tell the details and parts of the story that our history teachers and professors are leaving out of the curriculum. - The best path to this is through entertainment, we need to make works of historical fiction that simply show all the events of history as they occurred, with all details left in and nothing being left out, we need to show the full picture of how things were. There should be two categories of storytelling, the first is by filling in the details on some great white crime, and the second is putting the focus on some event that did not receive much attention or detail in history class, and make people who see this actually feel for the people involved in it. - For examples on the second story, a story on the bantu expansion from the perspective of african people who were victims in it, making it clear that the victim groups looked different from the group that were the perpetrators, ad that they were being targeted for their racial characteristics. Or a story on some white european family who were kidnapped from their homes on the north or west coasts of the continent, and taken to the ottomans as slaves. We need to make works of historical fiction that highlight the horrors of acts that white people are often shamed for, when they were being perpetrated by other, non-white races. when people start talking about this stuff, it's going to be controversial, but in a way that is good for us. We are showing stories that take place where the crime was either perpetrated by one non-white group against another, or by a non-white group against a white one. - For examples of the first category, we can make a story about a family of africans who were kidnapped and kept as slaves by other africans, we can then show the different paths these slaves took through this one family: We can show the slavery practices of africa, and what happened to those slaves who did not get sold. We can show what the arab slave trade was like through one of those sold to the arabs, and cover the slavery that occurred of africans in india. To the slave trade down to south america where those of hispanic origin took the slaves. We can cover the northern transatlantic slave trade in all of it's most controversial details, from the jewish ethnicity of the ship owners, to the jewish run slave markets in the carribean. The events that took place in haiti, which made it clear that it was about race, and not slavery, as black slaveowners were permitted to keep their slaves, but whites who did not own slaves and opposed the practice were slaughtered by blacks. The fact that the first blacks to be sold to america weren't sold as slaves but as indentured servants, and that most indentured servants were whites from europe, the existence of amerindians as both slaves and slave owners, the greater prominence of jewish and black slave owners in comparison with white slaveowners, and the true story of the events concerning Anthony Johnson that led to the passing of laws allowing slavery in america, and leading to the ending of the practice of indentured servitude. The events of the civil war in relation to slavery, which makes it clear that the war was not over slavery, highlighting the confederate rejection of a union proposal that would make slavery a permanent fixture of america in exchange for ending their campaign for secession, since their main concern was their lack of political, economic, and cultural representation in the union, and their founder-guaranteed right to secede from the union if they were dissatisfied with their place in it, and we could show the whole story of liberia, and why the project was aborted. If the series is to continue, we could go past slavery and onto lynchings, showing the details of how lynching started, that blacks participated in the mobs, and that whites were the overwhelming majority of the victims, how obviously guilty the "victims" were and that all these "victims", regardless of race, were killed for crimes like rape and murder, and not for petty crimes like "looking wrongly at someone of a superior race to themselves" (which in this case was stalking and intimidation followed by attempted assault/rape), we could even add a commentary on how all the black victims were innocent of the charges for which they'd been hanged, while all the whites were never declared innocent, or even discussed much at all. Last we could cover that the KKK weren't just killing any black guy they could get their hands upon, but specific people guilty of specific crimes, who would have been put to death regardless, the KKK only added political commentary over the events. We could cover segregation, and how it positively or negatively impacted both races, such as that just as blacks were restricted from white areas and business unless they followed certain rules, whites were even more restricted in black areas, as they were not even permitted to use businesses at all, and often were run out of black neighborhoods entirely, we could cover the prominent existence of black support for it at the time, we could discuss how the alternatives were not just integration, but also separation (secession), we could discuss the debates that were occurring at the time, the nature of the arguments used on each side, with particular focus given to the claim that integration would result in the economic collapse of black communities, which we see take place after integration was instated, we could cover the communist involvement with the integration initiative and the less savory characteristics/activities of pro-integration activists. then we could cover stories like the LA riots, and how the events that kicked them off were wholly misrepresented, we show them as they actually occurred, from the perspective of one of the black men in the car who obeyed the police instructions, we could go down the list of "innocent" blacks who were allegedly subjected to police brutality or misconduct, and show the facts regarding each of them. We can debunk the claim that blacks are failing in different areas, such as being more likely to be arrested/imprisoned and struggle economically, because of the events of oppression against them in the past, by making reference to the stories of how white people had also experienced similar oppression, often worse than what blacks had faced, and point out how that would mean whites should be doing equally or worse than the blacks as a result of those events. After all, if slavery and colonialism by another race was enough to set blacks back, then whites should never had advanced enough to enslave or colonize blacks in the first place, since they themselves were subject to slavery and colonialism by the arabs and mongols before that point in history, either whites are different from blacks in some way that makes the rules different for them, or this line of reasoning is flawed, and some other answer must be responsible for the problems that affect black people. - the purpose of these stories it to provoke sympathy for whites that would counteract the hostility that exists towards us, and hostility towards nonwhites that would counteract the sympathy that exists towards them. - I'm full of suggestions and ideas, I thought I'd share them with you guys, I expect a lot of shills who are against ideas that could allow us to make progress in changing of the culture, from which politics are downstream, if it means changing our rhetorical strategies.