WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

It's an experimental injection and we don't know if this makes their bodies unable to kill off other types of infections due to a compromised immune system. I'm choosing to avoid anyone that has gotten the Covid vaccine for my safety.

It's an experimental injection and we don't know if this makes their bodies unable to kill off other types of infections due to a compromised immune system. I'm choosing to avoid anyone that has gotten the Covid vaccine for my safety.

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

I think it turns them into some kind of hive-mind invader from space; an alien . Like *Invasion of the Body Snatchers". Don't trust anyone that has submitted to the pod... I mean the jab.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

met a naval officer on friday. asked if he got the poison jab. he said, "yeah, it's mandatory." i said, "no, it's not." then he said, "well i got the anthrax shot so what could this do that is worse?"

ffs. and this guy is an officer with over 20 years in. i told him to "get out and enjoy your life."

[–] 0 pt

He should look into how many vets from the first gulf war are still alive...

...never mind disabled.

[–] -5 pt

Fucking retarded science deniers. Go work in the field with niggers that's all you are good for

[–] 17 pts

My field is economics you fucking shill. I understand that a 1% chance of having complications from a flu is not worth a 5% chance of having complications from a vaccine that can't be "killed" or "treated" and is a permanent alteration of my body.

[–] 4 pts (edited )

^ This is why I think economists (reasonable ones) should be the last line of advisement for policy. Any time any other field takes the wheel we get overreach with very little consideration for unintended consequences. It's always very inefficient. Economists can use data provided to them by other experts. Dr. Fauci should not be directing medical policy. An economist should.

This is true from crime, immigration, work safety. An economist can make immigration policy much more efficient than building a wall. A request for your personal opinion.. What is the most effective way to spend $6 Billion on reducing illegal immigration. My instinct is to identify welfare leakage. You end up saving money and you reduce the incentives. They are moving here because some of their family is going to be on the receiving end of a mixed economy.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Is it or is not an experimental vaccine? How’s johnson and johnsons track record?

[–] 0 pt

Filthy kike. I bet our continued disobedience really shaves your sheckles doesnt it... you inbred genetic defect parasite piece of filth.

[–] 0 pt

stupid woman why my username says LGBTQWERTY?

Do you know how to use computer or you prefer sucking dicks for $10 a piece?